Literature DB >> 15262629

Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming.

Digby Elliott1, Steven Hansen, Jocelyn Mendoza, Luc Tremblay.   

Abstract

Over the last century, investigators have developed a number of models to explain the relation between speed and accuracy in target-directed manual aiming. The models vary in the extent to which they stress the importance of feedforward processes and the online use of sensory information (see D. Elliott, W. F. Helsen, & R. Chua, 2001, for a recent review). A common feature of those models is that the role of practice in optimizing speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure in goal-directed aiming is either ignored or minimized. The authors present a theoretical framework for understanding speed-accuracy tradeoffs that takes into account the strategic, trial-to-trial behavior of the performer. The strategic behavior enables individuals to maximize movement speed while minimizing error and energy expenditure.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262629     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.36.3.339-351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  35 in total

1.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement strategies in vertical aiming of older adults.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Digby Elliott; Andre Rodacki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: Movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications.

Authors:  James Lyons; Steve Hansen; Suzanne Hurding; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.

Authors:  Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.

Authors:  James J Burkitt; Victoria Staite; Afrisa Yeung; Digby Elliott; James L Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Factors underlying age-related changes in discrete aiming.

Authors:  Florian Van Halewyck; Ann Lavrysen; Oron Levin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Digby Elliott; Werner F Helsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21

9.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Urs Kleinholdermann; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Using 1/f noise to examine planning and control in a discrete aiming task.

Authors:  André B Valdez; Eric L Amazeen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.