Literature DB >> 11424646

Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

S R Glover1, P Dixon.   

Abstract

The effects of an orientation illusion on perception and 2 different actions were investigated. An 8-cm x 2-cm cylindrical bar was placed in front of participants at various orientations. A background grating was used to induce an orientation illusion. In a perception task, the illusion affected participants' ability to align the bar with their sagittal planes. In one reaching task, a similar effect of the illusion was found on the choice between 2 possible grasping postures. In a second reaching task involving a single grasping posture, the orientation illusion affected the orientation of the hand at the beginning of the reach but not near its end. The authors argue that reaching trajectories are planned and initiated through a context-dependent representation but are corrected on-line through a context-independent representation. The relation of this model to a more general dichotomy between perception and action is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11424646     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  38 in total

1.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping the meaning of words.

Authors:  Scott Glover; David A Rosenbaum; Jeremy Graham; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

6.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Timothy N Welsh; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-08

10.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.