BACKGROUND: One mechanism to increase participation in research is to solicit potential research participants' general willingness to be recruited into clinical trials. Such research permissions and consents typically are collected on paper upon patient registration. We describe a novel method of capturing this information electronically. PURPOSE: The objective is to enable the collection of research permissions and informed consent data electronically to permit tracking of potential research participants' interest in current and future research involvement and to provide a foundation for facilitating the research workflow. METHODS: The project involved systematic analysis focused on key areas, including existing business practices, registration processes, and permission collection workflows, and ascertaining best practices for presenting consent information to users via tablet technology and capturing permissions data. Analysis was followed by an iterative software development cycle with feedback from subject matter experts and users. RESULTS: An initial version of the software was piloted at one institution in South Carolina for a period of 1 year, during which consents and permission were collected during 2524 registrations of patients. The captured research permission data were transmitted to a clinical data warehouse. The software was later released as an open-source package that can be adopted for use by other institutions. LIMITATIONS: There are significant ethical, legal, and informatics challenges that must be addressed at an institution to deploy such a system. We have not yet assessed the long-term impact of the system on recruitment of patients to clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that by improving the ability to track willing potential research participants, we can improve recruitment into clinical trials and, in the process, improve patient education by introducing multimedia to informed consent documents.
BACKGROUND: One mechanism to increase participation in research is to solicit potential research participants' general willingness to be recruited into clinical trials. Such research permissions and consents typically are collected on paper upon patient registration. We describe a novel method of capturing this information electronically. PURPOSE: The objective is to enable the collection of research permissions and informed consent data electronically to permit tracking of potential research participants' interest in current and future research involvement and to provide a foundation for facilitating the research workflow. METHODS: The project involved systematic analysis focused on key areas, including existing business practices, registration processes, and permission collection workflows, and ascertaining best practices for presenting consent information to users via tablet technology and capturing permissions data. Analysis was followed by an iterative software development cycle with feedback from subject matter experts and users. RESULTS: An initial version of the software was piloted at one institution in South Carolina for a period of 1 year, during which consents and permission were collected during 2524 registrations of patients. The captured research permission data were transmitted to a clinical data warehouse. The software was later released as an open-source package that can be adopted for use by other institutions. LIMITATIONS: There are significant ethical, legal, and informatics challenges that must be addressed at an institution to deploy such a system. We have not yet assessed the long-term impact of the system on recruitment of patients to clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that by improving the ability to track willing potential research participants, we can improve recruitment into clinical trials and, in the process, improve patient education by introducing multimedia to informed consent documents.
Authors: Letha A Chadiha; Olivia G M Washington; Peter A Lichtenberg; Carmen R Green; Karen L Daniels; James S Jackson Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2011-06
Authors: Christopher N Schmickl; Man Li; Guangxi Li; Marnie M Wetzstein; Vitaly Herasevich; Ognjen Gajic; Roberto P Benzo Journal: Respir Med Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Shawn N Murphy; Griffin Weber; Michael Mendis; Vivian Gainer; Henry C Chueh; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Nyiramugisha K Niyibizi; Candace D Speight; Charlie Gregor; Yi-An Ko; Stephanie A Kraft; Andrea R Mitchell; Bradley G Phillips; Kathryn M Porter; Seema K Shah; Jeremy Sugarman; Benjamin S Wilfond; Neal W Dickert Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kapil Chalil Madathil; Reshmi Koikkara; Jihad Obeid; Joel S Greenstein; Iain C Sanderson; Katrina Fryar; Jay Moskowitz; Anand K Gramopadhye Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Elizabeth A Marshall; Jim C Oates; Azza Shoaibi; Jihad S Obeid; Melissa L Habrat; Robert W Warren; Kathleen T Brady; Leslie A Lenert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240