Literature DB >> 3336720

Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.

J W Oestmann1, R Greene, D C Kushner, P M Bourgouin, L Linetsky, H J Llewellyn.   

Abstract

The influence of viewing time on the detectability of subtle and obvious lung cancers was studied. Frontal chest radiographs of 40 patients with subtle cancers, 40 patients with obvious cancers, and 40 healthy control subjects were shown to four observers for four different viewing times (0.25 second, 1 second, 4 seconds, and unlimited time). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the detectability of lesions. Performance was degraded as viewing time decreased. The true-positive fractions for subtle and obvious cancers were 30% and 70% at 0.25 second and 74% and 98% at unlimited viewing time, respectively, for a given false-positive fraction of 20%. Thus, even with unlimited viewing time, the false-negative fraction for subtle cancers was 26%. The difference in detectability between subtle and obvious lung cancers was exaggerated at 1.0 second compared with 4 seconds and unlimited viewing time. The following conclusions were reached: (a) a substantial proportion of subtle lung lesions are missed, even with unlimited viewing time; (b) a large proportion of obvious lung cancers are detected with flash viewing; (c) the detectability of lesions decreases considerably as viewing time becomes less than 4 seconds; and (d) differences in detectability are exaggerated by short viewing times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3336720     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.2.3336720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists.

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Quality control in neuroradiology: impact of trainees on discrepancy rates.

Authors:  V G Viertel; L S Babiarz; M Carone; J S Lewin; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images?

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Karla Evans; Melissa L-H Võ; Francine L Jacobson; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.

Authors:  Feng Li; Roger Engelmann; Lorenzo L Pesce; Kunio Doi; Charles E Metz; Heber Macmahon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; Mark T Madsen; David J Kramer
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Chisaki Watanabe; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Izuru Matsuda; Soichiro Miki; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-01

8.  The Effects of Fatigue From Overnight Shifts on Radiology Search Patterns and Diagnostic Performance.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Matthew E Zygmont; Ryan Peterson; David Theriot; Haris Shekhani; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Tamara Miner Haygood; Julie Cooper; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The gist of the abnormal: above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Diane Georgian-Smith; Rosemary Tambouret; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.