Literature DB >> 31930156

Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images.

Melissa Treviño1, Baris Turkbey2, Bradford J Wood3, Peter A Pinto4, Marcin Czarniecki5, Peter L Choyke2, Todd S Horowitz1.   

Abstract

Radiologists can identify whether a radiograph is abnormal or normal at above chance levels in breast and lung images presented for half a second or less. This early perceptual processing has only been demonstrated in static two-dimensional images (e.g., mammograms). Can radiologists rapidly extract the "gestalt" from more complex imaging modalities? For example, prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) displays a series of images as a virtual stack and comprises multiple imaging sequences: anatomical information from the T2-weighted (T2W) sequence, functional information from diffusion-weighted imaging, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences. We first tested rapid perceptual processing in static T2W images then among the two functional sequences. Finally, we examined whether this rapid radiological perception could be observed using T2W multislice imaging. Readers with experience in prostate mpMRI could detect and localize lesions in all sequences after viewing a 500-ms static image. Experienced prostate readers could also detect and localize lesions when viewing multislice image stacks presented as brief movies, with image slices presented at either 48, 96, or 144 ms. The ability to quickly extract the perceptual gestalt may be a general property of expert perception, even in complex imaging modalities.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Keywords:  gestalt; multiparametric MRI; prostate; rapid perceptual processing; three-dimensional; two-dimensional

Year:  2020        PMID: 31930156      PMCID: PMC6941639          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  31 in total

1.  Time to understand pictures and words.

Authors:  M C Potter; B A Faulconer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  A Oliva; P G Schyns
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An analysis of perceptual and cognitive factors in radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  D P Carmody; C F Nodine; H L Kundel
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: does detection vary between high and low gleason score tumors?

Authors:  S Ikonen; P Kärkkäinen; L Kivisaari; J O Salo; K Taari; T Vehmas; P Tervahartiala; S Rannikko
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Henkjan J Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Huadong Miao; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  The gist of the abnormal: above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Diane Georgian-Smith; Rosemary Tambouret; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.

Authors:  Jonathan Peirce; Jeremy R Gray; Sol Simpson; Michael MacAskill; Richard Höchenberger; Hiroyuki Sogo; Erik Kastman; Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Behavioral medicine, cancer control, and NCI: reflections on a fruitful past and auspicious future.

Authors:  William M P Klein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.

Authors:  E M Raat; I Farr; J M Wolfe; K K Evans
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-11-06

Review 3.  Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 29.146

4.  Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners.

Authors:  Bethany Growns; Alice Towler; James D Dunn; Jessica M Salerno; N J Schweitzer; Itiel E Dror
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Characteristics of expert search behavior in volumetric medical image interpretation.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Ann J Carrigan; Megan Mills; William F Auffermann; Anina N Rich; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.