Literature DB >> 23770135

Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.

Leandro Koifman1, Daniel Hampl, Nelson Koifman, Antonio José Vides, Antonio Augusto Ornellas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reviewed our recent experience with inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer to assess the incidence and magnitude of complications caused by this procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 170 patients (340 procedures). Prophylactic and therapeutic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy was done in 67 (39.4%) and 103 patients (60.6%), respectively. Operative time and length of hospital stay were examined. Complications were divided into minor and major, and early (30 days or less after surgery) and late (greater than 30 days), and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 35 complications (10.3%) were observed, of which 25 (71.4%) were minor and 10 (28.6%) were major. We noted lymphedema in 14 patients (4.1%), seroma in 4 (1.2%), scrotal edema in 3 (0.9%), skin edge necrosis in 3 (0.9%), lymphocele in 3 (0.9%), wound infection in 2 (0.6%), flap necrosis in 2 (0.6%), wound abscess in 2 (0.6%) and deep venous thrombosis in 2 (0.6%). There was no significant difference in complication rates between patients treated with prophylactic vs therapeutic dissection. Mean hospital stay was 6.4 days (range 4 to 27). Average operative time for radical unilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was 94 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our contemporary series includes a lower incidence of complications, such as wound infection, skin flap necrosis, lymphocele and lymphedema. To our knowledge this series represents the lowest incidence rate of complications described in the international literature.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DVT; RIL; carcinoma; deep vein thrombosis; lymph node dissection; outcome assessment (health care); penis; postoperative complications; radical inguinal lymphadenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770135     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

1.  Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

Authors:  X Melody Qu; D Robert Siemens; Alexander V Louie; Darwin Yip; Aamer Mahmud
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Sarcopenia as a predictor of complications in penile cancer patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Jamie T Caracciolo; George J Richard; Michael A Poch; Julio Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Penile cancer: Perspective from a Canadian tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Benjamin Beech; Jonathan Izawa; Stephen Pautler; Joseph Chin; Nicholas Power
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) over Open Inguinal Block Dissection: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sandeep P Nayak; Harshwardhan Pokharkar; Jaiprakash Gurawalia; Kapil Dev; Srinivas Chanduri; M Vijayakumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14

7.  [Lymph-node-positive penile cancer : Management and systemic therapy].

Authors:  A Aziz; S Milerski; K Kernig; C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Progress on Management of Penile Cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Mohamed E Ahmed; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; R Jeffrey Karnes; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 9.  Robot assisted lymphadenectomy in urology: pelvic, retroperitoneal and inguinal.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Surena F Matin; Nazareno Suardi; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; James Porter; Robert J Stein; Rene Sotelo; Franco Gaboardi; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2016-11-08

10.  Practice Patterns Among Penile Cancer Surgeons Performing Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Radical Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Penile Cancer: A eUROGEN Survey.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Benjamin E Ayres; Allaudin Issa; Maarten Albersen; Nick Watkin; Asif Muneer; Vijay Sangar; Arie Parnham
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.