Literature DB >> 29319487

Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

X Melody Qu1, D Robert Siemens2, Alexander V Louie3, Darwin Yip1, Aamer Mahmud1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ability to predict lymph node (LN) status is essential in the management of men with localized squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis. There has been limited external validation of available risk stratification tools, particularly in routine clinical care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive variables of LN metastases within a large population-based cohort of patients.
METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, surgical pathology reports were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all patients who were diagnosed with penile cancer in Ontario, Canada. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate predictive variables for LN involvement. Three contemporary risk stratification schemes used to predict LN status were analyzed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: The study included 380 localized penile SCC cases treated between 2000 and 2010. Sixty-three (17%) had pathologically confirmed LN metastases. Among these, 35 (56%) were diagnosed within three months of the initial penile SCC diagnosis and these patients had a worse five-year disease-specific survival (43%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26-64) compared to patients who were diagnosed at a delayed LN dissection. On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.88), pathological stage (≥pT1b; OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.38-8.01), and tumour grade (Grade 2 OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.26-7.62; Grade 3 OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.32-11.9) were associated with an increased risk of LN metastases. Candidate risk stratification schemes demonstrated moderate to good property, with C-statistics ranging from 0.662-0.747.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a population-based cohort of penile cancer patients with a relatively low proportion of patients with pathologically confirmed LN involvement, we confirm and externally validate the importance of age, stage, and grade of the primary tumour in predicting nodal status.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29319487      PMCID: PMC5905539          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  25 in total

Review 1.  Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  S Horenblas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Evaluating Discrimination of Risk Prediction Models: The C Statistic.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Filiberto Zattoni; Walter Artibani; Andrea Fandella; Guido Martignoni; Giacomo Novara; Tommaso Prayer Galetti; Tiziano Zambolin; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  What price perfection? Calibration and discrimination of clinical prediction models.

Authors:  G A Diamond
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.

Authors:  Kai Yao; Hua Tu; Yong-Hong Li; Zi-Ke Qin; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Fang-Jian Zhou; Hui Han
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  A Lopes; G S Hidalgo; L P Kowalski; H Torloni; B M Rossi; F P Fonseca
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  How accurate are present risk group assignment tools in penile cancer?

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; G Novara; R Boscolo-Berto; W Artibani; M W Kattan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Lymph-node metastases in intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Carsten M Naumann; Ibrahim Alkatout; Amr Al-Najar; Joanna Beate Korda; Axel Hegele; Christian Bolenz; Heiko Ziegler; Günter Klöppel; Klaus-Peter Juenemann; Christof van der Horst
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer.

Authors:  E Solsona; F Algaba; S Horenblas; G Pizzocaro; T Windahl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  How accurately do Solsona and European Association of Urology risk groups predict for risk of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis?

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Gioacchino De Giorgi; Marina Gardiman; Guido Martignoni; Salvatore Siracusano; Regina Tardanico; Filiberto Zattoni; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors of lymph node status in penile cancer: High-quality administrative datasets give us insight into what's happening in our own backyard.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Predictors of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Jiao Hu; Yu Cui; Peihua Liu; Xu Zhou; Wenbiao Ren; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.989

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.