Literature DB >> 23765643

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.

P Benn1, H Cuckle, E Pergament.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma is revolutionizing prenatal screening and diagnosis. We review NIPT in the context of established screening and invasive technologies, the range of cytogenetic abnormalities detectable, cost, counseling and ethical issues. Current NIPT approaches involve whole-genome sequencing, targeted sequencing and assessment of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences between mother and fetus. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of NIPT for Down and Edwards syndromes, and possibly Patau syndrome, in high-risk women. Universal NIPT is not cost-effective, but using NIPT contingently in women found at moderate or high risk by conventional screening is cost-effective. Positive NIPT results must be confirmed using invasive techniques. Established screening, fetal ultrasound and invasive procedures with microarray testing allow the detection of a broad range of additional abnormalities not yet detectable by NIPT. NIPT approaches that take advantage of SNP information potentially allow the identification of parent of origin for imbalances, triploidy, uniparental disomy and consanguinity, and separate evaluation of dizygotic twins. Fetal fraction enrichment, improved sequencing and selected analysis of the most informative sequences should result in tests for additional chromosomal abnormalities. Providing adequate prenatal counseling poses a substantial challenge given the broad range of prenatal testing options now available.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; amniocentesis; aneuploidy; chorionic villus sampling; fetal DNA; maternal plasma; screening; sequencing; trisomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765643     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  77 in total

1.  Genetic counselors' experience with cell-free fetal DNA testing as a prenatal screening option for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Julie M H Horsting; Stephen R Dlouhy; Katelyn Hanson; Kimberly Quaid; Shaochun Bai; Karrie A Hines
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A commentary on comparison of the performance of Ion Torrent chips in noninvasive prenatal trisomy detection.

Authors:  Osamu Samura
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound.

Authors:  J I Iruretagoyena; M Grady; D Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Charles Dupras; Stanislav Birko; Aliya Affdal; Hazar Haidar; Marie-Eve Lemoine; Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-31

5.  Placental mosaicism for Trisomy 13: a challenge in providing the cell-free fetal DNA testing.

Authors:  Xiang-Yin Liu; Hong-Guo Zhang; Rui-Xue Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiao-Wei Yu; Rui-Zhi Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening strategies for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  N M Pinto; R Nelson; M Puchalski; T D Metz; K J Smith
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

8.  Comparison of indications and results of prenatal invasive diagnostic tests before and after the implementation of the use of cell-free fetal DNA: a tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Firat Okmen; Huseyin Ekici; Ismet Hortu; Metehan Imamoglu; Duygu Arican; Haluk Akın; Sermet Sagol
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 10.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.