Literature DB >> 29125628

Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Mylène Badeau1, Carmen Lindsay, Jonatan Blais, Leon Nshimyumukiza, Yemisi Takwoingi, Sylvie Langlois, France Légaré, Yves Giguère, Alexis F Turgeon, William Witteman, François Rousseau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common fetal aneuploidies include Down syndrome (trisomy 21 or T21), Edward syndrome (trisomy 18 or T18), Patau syndrome (trisomy 13 or T13), Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Triple X syndrome (47,XXX) and 47,XYY syndrome (47,XYY). Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies is standard care in many countries, but current biochemical and ultrasound tests have high false negative and false positive rates. The discovery of fetal circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) in maternal blood offers the potential for genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing (gNIPT) as a more accurate screening method. Two approaches used for gNIPT are massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS) and targeted massively parallel sequencing (TMPS).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MPSS and TMPS for gNIPT as a first-tier test in unselected populations of pregnant women undergoing aneuploidy screening or as a second-tier test in pregnant women considered to be high risk after first-tier screening for common fetal aneuploidies. The gNIPT results were confirmed by a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or neonatal clinical examination. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched 13 databases (including MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) from 1 January 2007 to 12 July 2016 without any language, search filter or publication type restrictions. We also screened reference lists of relevant full-text articles, websites of private prenatal diagnosis companies and conference abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies could include pregnant women of any age, ethnicity and gestational age with singleton or multifetal pregnancy. The women must have had a screening test for fetal aneuploidy by MPSS or TMPS and a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or medical records from birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently carried out study selection, data extraction and quality assessment (using the QUADAS-2 tool). Where possible, hierarchical models or simpler alternatives were used for meta-analysis. MAIN
RESULTS: Sixty-five studies of 86,139 pregnant women (3141 aneuploids and 82,998 euploids) were included. No study was judged to be at low risk of bias across the four domains of the QUADAS-2 tool but applicability concerns were generally low. Of the 65 studies, 42 enrolled pregnant women at high risk, five recruited an unselected population and 18 recruited cohorts with a mix of prior risk of fetal aneuploidy. Among the 65 studies, 44 evaluated MPSS and 21 evaluated TMPS; of these, five studies also compared gNIPT with a traditional screening test (biochemical, ultrasound or both). Forty-six out of 65 studies (71%) reported gNIPT assay failure rate, which ranged between 0% and 25% for MPSS, and between 0.8% and 7.5% for TMPS.In the population of unselected pregnant women, MPSS was evaluated by only one study; the study assessed T21, T18 and T13. TMPS was assessed for T21 in four studies involving unselected cohorts; three of the studies also assessed T18 and 13. In pooled analyses (88 T21 cases, 22 T18 cases, eight T13 cases and 20,649 unaffected pregnancies (non T21, T18 and T13)), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of TMPS was 99.2% (78.2% to 100%), 90.9% (70.0% to 97.7%) and 65.1% (9.16% to 97.2%) for T21, T18 and T13, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificity was above 99.9% for T21, T18 and T13.In high-risk populations, MPSS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in 30, 28, 20 and 12 studies, respectively. In pooled analyses (1048 T21 cases, 332 T18 cases, 128 T13 cases and 15,797 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of MPSS was 99.7% (98.0% to 100%), 97.8% (92.5% to 99.4%), 95.8% (86.1% to 98.9%) and 91.7% (78.3% to 97.1%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificities (95% CI) were 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.8% (99.8% to 99.9%) and 99.6% (98.9% to 99.8%). In this risk group, TMPS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in six, five, two and four studies. In pooled analyses (246 T21 cases, 112 T18 cases, 20 T13 cases and 4282 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% CI) of TMPS was 99.2% (96.8% to 99.8%), 98.2% (93.1% to 99.6%), 100% (83.9% to 100%) and 92.4% (84.1% to 96.5%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X respectively. The clinical specificities were above 100% for T21, T18 and T13 and 99.8% (98.3% to 100%) for 45,X. Indirect comparisons of MPSS and TMPS for T21, T18 and 45,X showed no statistical difference in clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity or both. Due to limited data, comparative meta-analysis of MPSS and TMPS was not possible for T13.We were unable to perform meta-analyses of gNIPT for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47,XYY because there were very few or no studies in one or more risk groups. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that MPSS and TMPS perform similarly in terms of clinical sensitivity and specificity for the detection of fetal T31, T18, T13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). However, no study compared the two approaches head-to-head in the same cohort of patients. The accuracy of gNIPT as a prenatal screening test has been mainly evaluated as a second-tier screening test to identify pregnancies at very low risk of fetal aneuploidies (T21, T18 and T13), thus avoiding invasive procedures. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing methods appear to be sensitive and highly specific for detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in high-risk populations. There is paucity of data on the accuracy of gNIPT as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test in a population of unselected pregnant women. With respect to the replacement of invasive tests, the performance of gNIPT observed in this review is not sufficient to replace current invasive diagnostic tests.We conclude that given the current data on the performance of gNIPT, invasive fetal karyotyping is still the required diagnostic approach to confirm the presence of a chromosomal abnormality prior to making irreversible decisions relative to the pregnancy outcome. However, most of the gNIPT studies were prone to bias, especially in terms of the selection of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29125628      PMCID: PMC6486016          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  272 in total

1.  PURLs: Aneuploidy screening: Newer noninvasive test gains traction.

Authors:  Sarah Nickolich; Narges Farahi; Kohar Jones; Anne Mounsey
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Cell-free DNA analysis for trisomy risk assessment in first-trimester twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Maria del Mar Gil; Maria Soledad Quezada; Barbara Bregant; Argyro Syngelaki; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  Practice Bulletin No. 163 Summary: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Maternal X chromosome copy number variations are associated with discordant fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies detected by noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Shaowei Wang; Shuai Huang; Linlin Ma; Lin Liang; Junrong Zhang; Jianguang Zhang; David S Cram
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Accurate description of DNA-based noninvasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Sau W Cheung; Ankita Patel; Tak Y Leung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012.

Authors:  E Mersy; L J M Smits; L A A P van Winden; C E M de Die-Smulders; A D C Paulussen; M V E Macville; A B C Coumans; S G M Frints
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing.

Authors:  Can Liao; Ai-hua Yin; Chun-fang Peng; Fang Fu; Jie-xia Yang; Ru Li; Yang-yi Chen; Dong-hong Luo; Yong-ling Zhang; Yan-mei Ou; Jian Li; Jing Wu; Ming-qin Mai; Rui Hou; Frances Wu; Hongrong Luo; Dong-zhi Li; Hai-liang Liu; Xiao-zhuang Zhang; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  [Significance of detecting free DNA from maternal plasma for the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies].

Authors:  Hong-yan Liu; Dong Wu; Hui Li; She-ke Guo; Chao-yang Zhang; Shi-xiu Liao; Ying-tai Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2012-08

Review 9.  A review of trisomy X (47,XXX).

Authors:  Nicole R Tartaglia; Susan Howell; Ashley Sutherland; Rebecca Wilson; Lennie Wilson
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Neurocognitive outcomes of individuals with a sex chromosome trisomy: XXX, XYY, or XXY: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Leggett; Patricia Jacobs; Kate Nation; Gaia Scerif; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 2.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 3.  Cytogenetics analysis as the central point of genetic testing in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a laboratory perspective for clinical applications.

Authors:  Aliaa Arina Rosli; Adam Azlan; Yaashini Rajasegaran; Yee Yik Mot; Olaf Heidenreich; Narazah Mohd Yusoff; Emmanuel Jairaj Moses
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 5.057

4.  Dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines and inhibition of VEGFA in the human umbilical cord are associated with negative pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Camron Chehroudi; Hugh Kim; Tricia E Wright; Abby C Collier
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Bounhome Soukkhaphone; Carmen Lindsay; Sylvie Langlois; Julian Little; Francois Rousseau; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Prenatal phenotype of 47, XXY (Klinefelter syndrome).

Authors:  Kate Swanson; Juliet C Bishop; Huda B Al-Kouatly; Mona Makhamreh; Thomas Felton; Neeta L Vora; Teresa N Sparks; Angie C Jelin
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.242

8.  Clinical performance of DNA-based prenatal screening using single-nucleotide polymorphisms approach in Thai women with singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Tachjaree Panchalee; Naravat Poungvarin; Warisa Amornrit; Julaporn Pooliam; Pattarawalai Taluengjit; Tuangsit Wataganara
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  47, XXX syndrome with infertility, premature ovarian insufficiency, and streak ovaries.

Authors:  Munazzah Rafique; Solaiman AlObaid; Dania Al-Jaroudi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-05-14

10.  Outcome of publicly funded nationwide first-tier noninvasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Kris Van Den Bogaert; Lore Lannoo; Nathalie Brison; Vincent Gatinois; Machteld Baetens; Bettina Blaumeiser; François Boemer; Laura Bourlard; Vincent Bours; Anne De Leener; Marjan De Rademaeker; Julie Désir; Annelies Dheedene; Armelle Duquenne; Nathalie Fieremans; Annelies Fieuw; Jean-Stéphane Gatot; Bernard Grisart; Katrien Janssens; Sandra Janssens; Damien Lederer; Axel Marichal; Björn Menten; Colombine Meunier; Leonor Palmeira; Bruno Pichon; Eva Sammels; Guillaume Smits; Yves Sznajer; Elise Vantroys; Koenraad Devriendt; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.