Literature DB >> 32440934

Comparison of indications and results of prenatal invasive diagnostic tests before and after the implementation of the use of cell-free fetal DNA: a tertiary referral center experience.

Firat Okmen1, Huseyin Ekici1, Ismet Hortu2,3, Metehan Imamoglu4, Duygu Arican5, Haluk Akın5, Sermet Sagol1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to compare the changes in the number, yield, and the percentage of karyotyping indications of the invasive prenatal diagnostic tests between the periods before and after cell-free fetal DNA was introduced to clinical use.
METHOD: The number of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, indication percentages and karyotype results in the periods before (January 1, 2009-December 31, 2010), (n = 1412) and after (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017), and (n = 593) the introduction of cell-free fetal DNA was retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: When compared with the period before cell-free fetal DNA came into clinical use, the number of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests decreased by 58% while their yield was found to have increased (4.4% vs. 10.3%) in the period after cell-free DNA began to be used (p < 0.001). While there was a decrease in the indications due to advanced maternal age, an increase was found in ultrasonography indications for structural anomaly and the risk of a single-gene disorder (p < 0.001). Amniocentesis rate was found to have decreased in invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure types, while an increase was reported in CVS rates (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Invasive prenatal diagnosis gradually decreases over the years, but the yield of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests increases. In parallel with the rapid development of modern molecular technologies and cheaper and easier access to the tests, we think that the number of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests will experience a more dramatic decrease in the following years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Cell free-fetal DNA; Chromosomal abnormality; Prenatal invasive test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32440934      PMCID: PMC7467995          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01825-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Antenatal sex determination.

Authors:  F FUCHS; P RIIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1956-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  P Benn; H Cuckle; E Pergament
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Trends in invasive prenatal diagnostic testing at a single institution.

Authors:  Adeola Awomolo; Kristy Palomares; Guadalupe Herrera Garcia; Todd Rosen; Christina Duzyj; Elena Ashkinadze
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women.

Authors:  A Tabor; J Philip; M Madsen; J Bang; E B Obel; B Nørgaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: impact on invasive prenatal diagnosis at a mainland Chinese tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Dong-Zhi Li; Li Zhen; Min Pan; Jin Han; Xin Yang; Yan-Mei Ou
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Shilpa Chetty; Matthew J Garabedian; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Practice Bulletin No. 162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Cosmin Deciu; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow; Louis M Neveux; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk van den Boom; Allan T Bombard; Wayne W Grody; Stanley F Nelson; Jacob A Canick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Non-invasive prenatal testing to detect chromosome aneuploidies in 57,204 pregnancies.

Authors:  Ying Xue; Guodong Zhao; Hong Li; Qin Zhang; Jiafeng Lu; Bin Yu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.