Literature DB >> 11336203

Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations.

A Guirao1, D R Williams, I G Cox.   

Abstract

An ideal correcting method, such as a customized contact lens, laser refractive surgery, or adaptive optics, that corrects higher-order aberrations as well as defocus and astigmatism could improve vision. The benefit achieved with this ideal method will be limited by decentration. To estimate the significance of this potential limitation we studied the effect on image quality expected when an ideal correcting method translates or rotates with respect to the eye's pupil. Actual wave aberrations were obtained from ten human eyes for a 7.3-mm pupil with a Shack-Hartmann sensor. We computed the residual aberrations that appear as a result of translation or rotation of an otherwise ideal correction. The model is valid for adaptive optics, contact lenses, and phase plates, but it constitutes only a first approximation to the laser refractive surgery case where tissue removal occurs. Calculations suggest that the typical decentrations will reduce only slightly the optical benefits expected from an ideal correcting method. For typical decentrations the ideal correcting method offers a benefit in modulation 2-4 times higher (1.5-2 times in white light) than with a standard correction of defocus and astigmatism. We obtained analytical expressions that show the impact of translation and rotation on individual Zernike terms. These calculations also reveal which aberrations are most beneficial to correct. We provided practical rules to implement a selective correction depending on the amount of decentration. An experimental study was performed with an aberrated artificial eye corrected with an adaptive optics system, validating the theoretical predictions. The results in a keratoconic subject, also corrected with adaptive optics, showed that important benefits are obtained despite decentrations in highly aberrated eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11336203     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.001003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  29 in total

1.  Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Yabo Yang; Keith Thompson; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The effect of optical zone decentration on lower- and higher-order aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy in a cat model.

Authors:  Jens Bühren; Geunyoung Yoon; Shawn Kenner; Scott MacRae; Krystel Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality.

Authors:  Yafei Niu; Edwin J Sarver; Scott B Stevenson; Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Optical quality of aspheric toric intraocular lenses at different degrees of decentering.

Authors:  Cari Pérez-Vives; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Quantification of ghosting produced with presbyopic contact lens correction.

Authors:  Pete S Kollbaum; BoKaye M Dietmeier; Meredith E Jansen; Martin E Rickert
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.018

10.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.