Literature DB >> 23749343

Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference.

Gregory B Maletis1, Maria C S Inacio, Sarah Reynolds, Jamie L Desmond, Michela M Maletis, Tadashi T Funahashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be devastating. Hamstring tendon autografts may be more susceptible to infections than other graft types.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in a large sample of patients who underwent ACLR and to evaluate the risk of superficial and deep SSIs associated with grafts used for ACLR. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: All primary ACLRs performed between February 2005 and September 2010 registered in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry were included in the study. The graft types evaluated included the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft, and allograft (all types). The main end point of the study, SSIs (deep and superficial), was prospectively ascertained using an electronic screening algorithm and adjudicated by the principal investigator. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort, and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of an infection.
RESULTS: There were 10,626 cases that fit the study criteria. The overall cohort was 64% male, mean age was 29 ± 11 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 27 ± 5 kg/m2. The overall incidence of SSIs was 0.48% (n = 51), with 17 (0.16%) superficial infections and 34 (0.32%) deep infections. Hamstring tendon autografts (n = 20; 0.61%) had the highest incidence of deep SSIs of the graft types (BPTB autograft, n = 2 [0.07%]; allograft, n = 12 [0.27%]; P < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, the likelihood of a patient with a hamstring autograft having a deep SSI was 8.24 times higher (95% CI, 1.91-35.55; P = .005) than someone receiving a BPTB autograft. The risk of infections in allografts was not statistically significantly higher than BPTB autografts.
CONCLUSION: The overall SSI rate after ACLR was 0.48%. Deep SSIs were identified in 0.32% of the ACLR cases and superficial SSIs in 0.16%. An 8.2-times higher risk of SSIs was observed in hamstring tendon autografts compared with BPTB autografts. No difference in SSI incidence was identified between allografts and BPTB autografts. Surgeons should bear in mind that although the overall infection rates after ACLR are low, there is an increased risk of deep infections with hamstring tendon autografts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; hamstring autograft; infection; surgical site infection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23749343     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513490665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

Review 1.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Factors associated with infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright; Laura J Huston; Samuel K Nwosu; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Semitendinosus Tendon Using the PINN-ACL CrossPin System: Minimum 4-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Hee-Soo Kyung; Seung-Gil Baek; Byoung-Joo Lee; Chang-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-02

4.  Contamination occurs during ACL graft harvesting and manipulation, but it can be easily eradicated.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; María E Portillo; Raúl Torres-Claramunt; Xavier Pelfort; Pedro Hinarejos; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Autograft soaking in vancomycin reduces the risk of infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Raúl Torres-Claramunt; Pablo E Gelber; Tamer M A Shehata; Xavier Pelfort; Joan Carles Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Functional outcome of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Justus Gille; Ulf Gerlach; Ralf Oheim; Thorben Hintze; Bastian Himpe; Arndt-Peter Schultz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Atopic dermatitis is a novel demographic risk factor for surgical site infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Manabu Kawata; Yusuke Sasabuchi; Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Hamstring autografts are associated with a high rate of contamination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Z Alomar; Saud M Alfayez; Ali M Somily
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The Effect of Gentamycin in the Irrigating Solution to Prevent Joint Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hamidreza Yazdi; Alireza Yousof Gomrokchi; Ara Nazarian; Aron Lechtig; Philip Hanna; Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-01

10.  Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright; Laura J Huston; Amanda K Haas; Christina R Allen; Allen F Anderson; Daniel E Cooper; Thomas M DeBerardino; Warren R Dunn; Brett Brick A Lantz; Barton Mann; Kurt P Spindler; Michael J Stuart; John P Albright; Annunziato Ned Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Annunziata; Robert A Arciero; Bernard R Bach; Champ L Baker; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Keith M Baumgarten; Jeffery R Bechler; Jeffrey H Berg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Stephen F Brockmeier; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Jay Brad V Butler; John D Campbell; James L Carey; James E Carpenter; Brian J Cole; Jonathan M Cooper; Charles L Cox; Robert Alexander Creighton; Diane L Dahm; Tal S David; David C Flanigan; Robert W Frederick; Theodore J Ganley; Elizabeth A Garofoli; Charles J Gatt; Steven R Gecha; James Robert Giffin; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Christopher D Harner; Norman Lindsay Harris; Keith S Hechtman; Elliott B Hershman; Rudolf G Hoellrich; Timothy M Hosea; David C Johnson; Timothy S Johnson; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Ganesh V Kamath; Thomas E Klootwyk; Bruce A Levy; Chunbong Benjamin Ma; G Peter Maiers; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Gregory M Mathien; David R McAllister; Eric C McCarty; Robert G McCormack; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Daniel F O'Neill; Brett D Owens; Richard D Parker; Mark L Purnell; Arun J Ramappa; Michael A Rauh; Arthur C Rettig; Jon K Sekiya; Kevin G Shea; Orrin H Sherman; Xulei Li; James R Slauterbeck; Matthew V Smith; Jeffrey T Spang; Ltc Steven J Svoboda; Timothy N Taft; Joachim J Tenuta; Edwin M Tingstad; Armando F Vidal; Darius G Viskontas; Richard A White; James S Williams; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; James J York
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.