Literature DB >> 24831103

Combination of longitudinal biomarkers in predicting binary events.

Danping Liu1, Paul S Albert2.   

Abstract

In disease screening, the combination of multiple biomarkers often substantially improves the diagnostic accuracy over a single marker. This is particularly true for longitudinal biomarkers where individual trajectory may improve the diagnosis. We propose a pattern mixture model (PMM) framework to predict a binary disease status from a longitudinal sequence of biomarkers. The marker distribution given the disease status is estimated from a linear mixed effects model. A likelihood ratio statistic is computed as the combination rule, which is optimal in the sense of the maximum receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve under the correctly specified mixed effects model. The individual disease risk score is then estimated by Bayes' theorem, and we derive the analytical form of the 95% confidence interval. We show that this PMM is an approximation to the shared random effects (SRE) model proposed by Albert (2012. A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects mis-specification. Statistics in Medicine 31: (2), 143-154). Further, with extensive simulation studies, we found that the PMM is more robust than the SRE model under wide classes of models. This new PPM approach for combining biomarkers is motivated by and applied to a fetal growth study, where the interest is in predicting macrosomia using longitudinal ultrasound measurements. Published by Oxford University Press 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area under ROC curve; Fetal growth; Longitudinal biomarker combination; Macrosomia; Pattern mixture model; Risk estimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24831103      PMCID: PMC4168317          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  12 in total

1.  Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.

Authors:  M S Pepe; M L Thompson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  On linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Enrique F Schisterman; Yan Zhu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Predicting renal graft failure using multivariate longitudinal profiles.

Authors:  Steffen Fieuws; Geert Verbeke; Bart Maes; Yves Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Combining multiple markers for classification using ROC.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring: conditional linear model.

Authors:  M C Wu; K R Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification.

Authors:  Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.

Authors:  Danping Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Chunling Liu; Aiyi Liu; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Pre-pregnancy risk factors of small-for-gestational age births among parous women in Scandinavia.

Authors:  L S Bakketeig; G Jacobsen; H J Hoffman; G Lindmark; P Bergsjø; K Molne; J Rødsten
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  10 in total

1.  The ROC curve for regularly measured longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Haben Michael; Lu Tian; Musie Ghebremichael
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Identifying subgroups of enhanced predictive accuracy from longitudinal biomarker data using tree-based approaches: applications to fetal growth.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Danping Liu; Paul S Albert; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  Discriminatory capacity of prenatal ultrasound measures for large-for-gestational-age birth: A Bayesian approach to ROC analysis using placement values.

Authors:  Soutik Ghosal; Zhen Chen
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.

Authors:  Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.829

5.  A multivariate parametric empirical Bayes screening approach for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using multiple longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Nabihah Tayob; Anna S F Lok; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Combined 3 Tesla MRI Biomarkers Improve the Differentiation between Benign vs Malignant Single Ring Enhancing Brain Masses.

Authors:  Simone Salice; Roberto Esposito; Domenico Ciavardelli; Stefano Delli Pizzi; Rossella di Bastiano; Armando Tartaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Prediction complements explanation in understanding the developing brain.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; B J Casey; Avram J Holmes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Maynor Garcia; Zhonghui Xu; Steven J Korzeniewski; Homam Saker; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods.

Authors:  Lucy M Bull; Mark Lunt; Glen P Martin; Kimme Hyrich; Jamie C Sergeant
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2020-07-09

10.  Value of dynamic clinical and biomarker data for mortality risk prediction in COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Carlo Berzuini; Cathal Hannan; Andrew King; Andy Vail; Claire O'Leary; David Brough; James Galea; Kayode Ogungbenro; Megan Wright; Omar Pathmanaban; Sharon Hulme; Stuart Allan; Luisa Bernardinelli; Hiren C Patel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.