OBJECTIVE: To characterise the feasibility and safety of a novel transurethral ultrasound (US)-therapy device combined with real-time multi-plane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based temperature monitoring and temperature feedback control, to enable spatiotemporally precise regional ablation of simulated prostate gland lesions in a preclinical canine model. To correlate ablation volumes measured with intra-procedural cumulative thermal damage estimates, post-procedural MRI, and histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dogs were treated with three targeted ablations each, using a prototype MRI-guided transurethral US-therapy system (Philips Healthcare, Vantaa, Finland). MRI provided images for treatment planning, guidance, real-time multi-planar thermometry, as well as post-treatment evaluation of efficacy. After treatment, specimens underwent histopathological analysis to determine the extent of necrosis and cell viability. Statistical analyses (Pearson's correlation, Student's t-test) were used to evaluate the correlation between ablation volumes measured with intra-procedural cumulative thermal damage estimates, post-procedural MRI, and histopathology. RESULTS: MRI combined with a transurethral US-therapy device enabled multi-planar temperature monitoring at the target as well as in surrounding tissues, allowing for safe, targeted, and controlled ablations of prescribed lesions. Ablated volumes measured by cumulative thermal dose positively correlated with volumes determined by histopathological analysis (r(2) 0.83, P < 0.001). Post-procedural contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI showed a positive correlation with non-viable areas on histopathological analysis (r(2) 0.89, P < 0.001, and r(2) 0.91, P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, there was a positive correlation between ablated volumes according to cumulative thermal dose and volumes identified on post-procedural contrast-enhanced MRI (r(2) 0.77, P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean ablation volumes assessed with the various analysis methods (P > 0.05, Student's t-test). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided transurethral US therapy enabled safe and targeted ablations of prescribed lesions in a preclinical canine prostate model. Ablation volumes were reliably predicted by intra- and post-procedural imaging. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the feasibility, safety, oncological control, and functional outcomes of this therapy in patients in whom focal therapy is indicated.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the feasibility and safety of a novel transurethral ultrasound (US)-therapy device combined with real-time multi-plane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based temperature monitoring and temperature feedback control, to enable spatiotemporally precise regional ablation of simulated prostate gland lesions in a preclinical canine model. To correlate ablation volumes measured with intra-procedural cumulative thermal damage estimates, post-procedural MRI, and histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dogs were treated with three targeted ablations each, using a prototype MRI-guided transurethral US-therapy system (Philips Healthcare, Vantaa, Finland). MRI provided images for treatment planning, guidance, real-time multi-planar thermometry, as well as post-treatment evaluation of efficacy. After treatment, specimens underwent histopathological analysis to determine the extent of necrosis and cell viability. Statistical analyses (Pearson's correlation, Student's t-test) were used to evaluate the correlation between ablation volumes measured with intra-procedural cumulative thermal damage estimates, post-procedural MRI, and histopathology. RESULTS: MRI combined with a transurethral US-therapy device enabled multi-planar temperature monitoring at the target as well as in surrounding tissues, allowing for safe, targeted, and controlled ablations of prescribed lesions. Ablated volumes measured by cumulative thermal dose positively correlated with volumes determined by histopathological analysis (r(2) 0.83, P < 0.001). Post-procedural contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI showed a positive correlation with non-viable areas on histopathological analysis (r(2) 0.89, P < 0.001, and r(2) 0.91, P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, there was a positive correlation between ablated volumes according to cumulative thermal dose and volumes identified on post-procedural contrast-enhanced MRI (r(2) 0.77, P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean ablation volumes assessed with the various analysis methods (P > 0.05, Student's t-test). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided transurethral US therapy enabled safe and targeted ablations of prescribed lesions in a preclinical canine prostate model. Ablation volumes were reliably predicted by intra- and post-procedural imaging. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the feasibility, safety, oncological control, and functional outcomes of this therapy in patients in whom focal therapy is indicated.
Authors: R S Foster; R Bihrle; N Sanghvi; F Fry; K Kopecky; J Regan; J Eble; C Hennige; L V Hennige; J P Donohue Journal: Eur Urol Date: 1993 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Rajiv Chopra; Alexandra Colquhoun; Mathieu Burtnyk; William A N'djin; Ilya Kobelevskiy; Aaron Boyes; Kashif Siddiqui; Harry Foster; Linda Sugar; Masoom A Haider; Michael Bronskill; Laurence Klotz Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Mark S Litwin; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; James M Henning; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ken Tatebe; Elizabeth Ramsay; Charles Mougenot; Mohammad Kazem; Hamed Peikari; Michael Bronskill; Rajiv Chopra Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Steffen Sammet; Ari Partanen; Ambereen Yousuf; Christina L Sammet; Emily V Ward; Craig Wardrip; Marek Niekrasz; Tatjana Antic; Aria Razmaria; Keyvan Farahani; Shunmugavelu Sokka; Gregory Karczmar; Aytekin Oto Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-12-28
Authors: Elizabeth Ramsay; Charles Mougenot; Robert Staruch; Aaron Boyes; Mohammad Kazem; Michael Bronskill; Harry Foster; Linda Sugar; Masoom Haider; Laurence Klotz; Rajiv Chopra Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sandeep Sankineni; Bradford J Wood; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Annerleim Walton Diaz; Anthony N Hoang; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Barış Türkbey Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Gregory J Anthony; Viktor Bollen; Samuel Hendley; Tatjana Antic; Steffen Sammet; Kenneth B Bader Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Sharon L Giles; Jessica M Winfield; David J Collins; Ian Rivens; John Civale; Gail R Ter Haar; Nandita M deSouza Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2018-05-10