Literature DB >> 24637316

Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up.

Berrend G Muller1, Willemien van den Bos, Peter A Pinto, Jean J de la Rosette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Focal therapy for prostate cancer is emerging as a management option between active surveillance and radical treatments. In this article, we present two of the most important imaging modalities in focal therapy, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ultrasonography. We review the recent advances within these two platforms. RECENT
FINDINGS: State-of-the-art imaging in all phases of focal therapy is essential for treatment safety. In patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up, different aspects of imaging are important. mpMRI is an imaging technology with high imaging resolution and contrast. This makes it an excellent technology for patient selection and treatment planning and follow-up. Ultrasound has the unique property of real-time image acquisition. This makes it an excellent technology for real-time treatment guidance. There are multiple novelties in these two platforms that have increased the accuracy considerably. Examples in ultrasound are contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, elastography, shear-wave elastography, and histoscanning. In mpMRI, these advantages consist of multiple sequences combined to one image and magnetic resonance thermometry.
SUMMARY: Standardization of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound and mpMRI is of paramount importance. For targeted treatment and follow-up, a good negative predictive value of the test is important. There is much to gain from both of these developing fields and imaging accuracy of the two platforms is comparable. Standardization in conduct and interpretation, three-dimensional reconstruction, and fusion of the two platforms can make focal therapy the standard of care for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24637316      PMCID: PMC4048732          DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  45 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with contrast-tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography.

Authors:  Shao Wei Xie; Hong Li Li; Jing Du; Jian Guo Xia; Yi Fen Guo; Mei Xin; Feng Hua Li
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion.

Authors:  Osamu Ukimura; Mihir M Desai; Suzanne Palmer; Samuel Valencerina; Mitchell Gross; Andre L Abreu; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Quantitative evaluation of computed high B value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Marnix C Maas; Jurgen J Fütterer; Tom W J Scheenen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Use of patient-specific MRI-based prostate mold for validation of multiparametric MRI in localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hari Trivedi; Baris Turkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Compton J Benjamin; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Vijay Shah; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; W Marston Linehan; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound therapy of the prostate: a preclinical study with radiological and pathological correlation using customised MRI-based moulds.

Authors:  Ari Partanen; Nitin K Yerram; Hari Trivedi; Matthew R Dreher; Juha Oila; Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Jeffrey Nix; Baris Turkbey; Marcelino Bernardo; Diana C Haines; Compton J Benjamin; W Marston Linehan; Peter Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Gösta J Ehnholm; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Richard Memo; Carl R Schaub
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.657

Review 8.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  In vivo 31P MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 7 T: safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Thiele Kobus; Andreas K Bitz; Mark J van Uden; Miriam W Lagemaat; Eva Rothgang; Stephan Orzada; Arend Heerschap; Tom W J Scheenen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

2.  Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  3D Registration of mpMRI for Assessment of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Clément Orczyk; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Artem Mikheev; Arnauld Villers; Myriam Bernaudin; Samir S Taneja; Samuel Valable; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Pending Questions.

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Anna M Brown; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

Review 6.  Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Daniel Costa; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  [Organ and function preservation in prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Fröhner; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  The prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Francesca Patella; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Edoardo Zanchetta; Chiara Floridi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Chloë Standaert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Development of an orthotopic canine prostate cancer model expressing human GRPr.

Authors:  Michael F Tweedle; Haiming Ding; William T Drost; Joshua Dowell; James Spain; Mathew Joseph; Said M Elshafae; Maria-Isabela Menendez; Li Gong; Shankaran Kothandaraman; Wessel P Dirksen; Chadwick L Wright; Robert Bahnson; Michael V Knopp; Thomas J Rosol
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.