Literature DB >> 15017184

The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Jeanette M Broering, Mark S Litwin, Deborah P Lubeck, Shilpa S Mehta, James M Henning, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer have changed dramatically in the prostate specific antigen era. A large disease registry facilitates the longitudinal observation of trends in disease presentation, management and outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) is a national disease registry of more than 10000 men with prostate cancer accrued at 31 primarily community based sites across the United States. Demographic, clinical, quality of life and resource use variables are collected on each patient. We reviewed key findings from the data base in the last 8 years in the areas of disease management trends, and oncological and quality of life outcomes.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer is increasingly diagnosed with low risk clinical characteristics. With time patients have become less likely to receive pretreatment imaging tests, less likely to pursue watchful waiting and more likely to receive brachytherapy or hormonal therapy. Relatively few patients treated with radical prostatectomy in the database are under graded or under staged before surgery, whereas the surgical margin rate is comparable to that in academic series. CaPSURE data confirm the usefulness of percent positive biopsies in risk assessment and they have further been used to validate multiple preoperative nomograms. CaPSURE results strongly affirm the necessity of patient reported quality of life assessment. Multiple studies have compared the quality of life impact of various treatment options, particularly in terms of urinary and sexual function, and bother.
CONCLUSIONS: The presentation and management of prostate cancer have changed substantially in the last decade. CaPSURE will continue to track these trends as well as oncological and quality of life outcomes, and will continue to be an invaluable resource for the study of prostate cancer at the national level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017184     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000107247.81471.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  100 in total

1.  Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Meredith M Regan; Matthew R Cooperberg; John T Wei; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Larry Hembroff; Natalia Sadetsky; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin; Eric Klein; Adam S Kibel; Daniel A Hamstra; Louis L Pisters; Deborah A Kuban; Irving D Kaplan; David P Wood; Jay Ciezki; Rodney L Dunn; Peter R Carroll; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Can erectile function be predicted after prostate cancer treatment?

Authors:  Frances M Alba; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  A systematic review of large-scale surveys of cancer survivors conducted in North America, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Catherine C Lerro; Kevin D Stein; Tenbroeck Smith; Katherine S Virgo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Role of regenerative therapies on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S T Hansen; M Lund; L D Ostergaard; L Lund
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Managing the low-socioeconomic-status prostate cancer patient.

Authors:  Walter Rayford
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  Radiosensitization of prostate cancer by priming the wild-type p53-dependent cellular senescence pathway.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; James A McCubrey; David M Terrian
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 8.  Androgen deprivation therapy: progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion.

Authors:  William P Harris; Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-02

9.  Using fiducial markers in the prostate bed in postprostatectomy external beam radiation therapy improves accuracy over surgical clips.

Authors:  I Fortin; J-F Carrier; M-C Beauchemin; D Béliveau-Nadeau; G Delouya; D Taussky
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Impact of folate intake on prostate cancer recurrence following definitive therapy: data from CaPSURE™.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Erin L Richman; Natalia Sadetsky; Denise S O'Keefe; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin J Davies; June M Chan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.