Literature DB >> 12467367

The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version.

Robyn M Cox1, Genevieve C Alexander.   

Abstract

The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) is a seven-item questionnaire designed to be generally applicable in evaluating the effectiveness of hearing aid treatments. The inventory was developed to facilitate cooperation among researchers and program evaluators in diverse settings. It is brief and general enough to be appended to other outcome measures that might be planned in a particular application, and will provide directly comparable data across otherwise incompatible projects. For this plan to be successful, it is essential to generate psychometrically equivalent translations in the languages in which hearing aid research and treatment assessments are performed. This article reports the psychometric properties of the inventory for the original English version. The items are reasonably internally consistent, providing adequate statistical support for summing the scores to generate a total outcome score. However, for maximum internal consistency, it would be desirable to generate two scores for the inventory.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12467367     DOI: 10.3109/14992020209101309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  69 in total

1.  Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial.

Authors:  Harvey B Abrams; Theresa H Chisolm; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  Rurality and determinants of hearing healthcare in adult hearing aid recipients.

Authors:  Stephen Chan; Brian Hixon; Margaret Adkins; Jennifer B Shinn; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Authors:  Dianne J Van Tasell; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

8.  Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

Authors:  ShienPei Silverman; Megan Cates; Gabrielle Saunders
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lauren Kawaguchi; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Christi Miller
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 10.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.