Literature DB >> 22752928

Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era.

Ricky Kaplan-Neeman1, Chava Muchnik, Minka Hildesheimer, Yael Henkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate satisfaction ratings and use patterns of advanced digital hearing aids (HAs) in a group of hearing-impaired adults by means of self-report questionnaires. STUDY
DESIGN: A self report questionnaire study.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven hearing-impaired adults who were fitted with advanced digital HAs at the Speech and Hearing Center at Sheba Medical Center were asked to participate in a structured telephone interview regarding HA satisfaction and use by means of the Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire. Patients who were not using their HAs completed a nonuse questionnaire.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 74%. Eighty-three percent used their HAs regularly, whereas 17% were nonusers. Of the users, 92% were satisfied to some degree with their HAs. The global SADL score was 5.12 on a scale of 1 to 7. Background variables that were significantly associated with satisfaction ratings were hours of HA use per day, fitting mode (binaural vs. monaural), age, and degree of hearing loss. Although nonuse was not significantly associated with background variables, the main reasons for nonuse were excessive amplification in background noise and minimal functional benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: High satisfaction and use rates were characteristic of adults fitted with advanced digital HAs. Patients should be advised that longer use of HAs per day may lead to higher satisfaction and that binaural amplification is advantageous, especially while communicating in noise. Finally, expectation from HA functionality in challenging listening situations should be realistic, as additional research and technology development is still needed.
Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752928     DOI: 10.1002/lary.23404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  9 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

2.  Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.

Authors:  Xunyi Wang; Yun Zheng; Yiran Liu; Jingzhe Lu; Zhiyuan Cui; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Auditory Perceptual Exercises in Adults Adapting to the Use of Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Hanin Karah; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  [User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].

Authors:  J Kießling; S Kreikemeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of Hearing Aid Use on Falls Risk in Individuals With Self-Reported Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kristal M Riska; Sarah B Peskoe; Alex Gordee; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Satisfaction with Hearing Aids Based on Technology and Style among Hearing Impaired Persons.

Authors:  Farzad Faraji-Khiavi; Rezvan Dashti; Seyyed-Jalal Sameni; Arash Bayat
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09

7.  A Novel Communication Value Task Demonstrates Evidence of Response Bias in Cases with Presbyacusis.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Brandon S Bentzley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

9.  Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Janine Fj Meijerink; Marieke Pronk; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Vera Jansen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.