Literature DB >> 23740552

Individual differences in eye movements during face identification reflect observer-specific optimal points of fixation.

Matthew F Peterson1, Miguel P Eckstein.   

Abstract

In general, humans tend to first look just below the eyes when identifying another person. Does everybody look at the same place on a face during identification, and, if not, does this variability in fixation behavior lead to functional consequences? In two conditions, observers had their free eye movements recorded while they performed a face-identification task. In another condition, the same observers identified faces while their gaze was restricted to specific locations on each face. We found substantial differences, which persisted over time, in where individuals chose to first move their eyes. Observers' systematic departure from a canonical, theoretically optimal fixation point did not correlate with performance degradation. Instead, each individual's looking preference corresponded to an idiosyncratic performance-maximizing point of fixation: Those who looked lower on the face performed better when forced to fixate the lower part of the face. The results suggest an observer-specific synergy between the face-recognition and eye movement systems that optimizes face-identification performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye movements; face perception; individual differences

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23740552      PMCID: PMC6590077          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612471684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  42 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural Representations of Faces Are Tuned to Eye Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Stacchi; Meike Ramon; Junpeng Lao; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Authors:  Demet Gurler; Nathan Doyle; Edgar Walker; John Magnotti; Michael Beauchamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Face viewing behavior predicts multisensory gain during speech perception.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Kira Wegner-Clemens; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

7.  Eye-movement patterns in face recognition are associated with cognitive decline in older adults.

Authors:  Cynthia Y H Chan; Antoni B Chan; Tatia M C Lee; Janet H Hsiao
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Assessing Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery Outcomes: Does Gender Identity Alter Gaze?

Authors:  Shanique A Martin; Viren Patel; Shane D Morrison; David Kahn; Thomas Satterwhite; Rahim Nazerali
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.