Literature DB >> 23733362

What patients and surgeons should know about the consequences of appendectomy for acute appendicitis after long-term follow-up: factors influencing the incidence of chronic abdominal complaints.

M Ditzel1, T M van Ginhoven, J B C van der Wal, W Hop, P P L O Coene, J F Lange, E van der Harst.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abscess formation and perforation are complications of acute appendicitis that lead to localized or generalized peritonitis. The long-term implications of complicated appendectomy remain largely unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, it was investigated whether patients with complicated appendicitis experienced more abdominal complaints after long-term follow-up when compared to uncomplicated cases. In addition, the influence of operation technique (open versus laparoscopic) was studied. A retrospective analysis of 1,481 appendectomies for acute appendicitis was performed in two centers from January 2000 until January 2006. Demographic data, operative reports, intraoperatively adhesions and complications, abdominal pain, and satisfaction were monitored. In total, 1,433 patients were invited to fill out a questionnaire with a median follow-up of 7.1 years. Questionnaires of 526 (37 %) patients were suitable for analysis.
RESULTS: Perforation, abdominal abscesses, or adhesions at initial operation did not result in more abdominal complaints when compared to appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Additionally, no significant differences in abdominal complaints were seen between laparoscopic and open techniques.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results of our study show that after follow-up of 7 years, the incidence of abdominal complaints was not influenced by operative technique or whether acute appendicitis was complicated or not. This finding does not support a causative role for adhesions with regard to chronic abdominal complaints. Our data enables surgeons to inform their patients about the long-term results of appendectomy, whether it was complicated or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733362     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2235-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy--quality of life 7 years after surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Florian Friedrich; Jürgen Hedderich; Tim Schulz; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence?

Authors:  Terry T W Leung; Elijah Dixon; Manpreet Gill; Brett D Mador; Kyle M Moulton; Gilaad G Kaplan; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M Schäfer; L Krähenb hl; M W Büchler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy.

Authors:  R E Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Authors:  S G Levrant; E J Bieber; R B Barnes
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1997-05

7.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Ellis; B J Moran; J N Thompson; M C Parker; M S Wilson; D Menzies; A McGuire; A M Lower; R J Hawthorn; F O'Brien; S Buchan; A M Crowe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.

Authors:  P Lundorff; M Hahlin; B Källfelt; J Thorburn; B Lindblom
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Hasan H Eker; Wim C J Hop; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  New strategy during complicated open appendectomy: convert open operation to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jin-Hui Zhu; Wei Li; Kai Yu; Jia Wu; Yun Ji; Jian-Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Establishing the need for clinical follow-up after emergency appendicectomy in the modern era: Retrospective case series of 145 patients.

Authors:  Robin Som; Nicky Seymour; Sri G Thrumurthy; Sophia Khattak; Shivani Joshi; Paolo G Sorelli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.