Literature DB >> 1827075

Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.

P Lundorff1, M Hahlin, B Källfelt, J Thorburn, B Lindblom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women with ectopic pregnancy (EP) who have been operated on by laparoscopy are thought to have improved subsequent fertility, probably because of less adhesion formation. We aimed to evaluate the adhesion formation after laparoscopy as compared with laparotomy in a randomized trial.
DESIGN: One hundred five patients with tubal pregnancy were stratified with regard to age and risk factors and randomized to surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy. To evaluate adhesion formation and tubal status, 73 patients with strong desire of pregnancy underwent a second-look laparoscopy. The adhesion status at the ipsilateral and contralateral side at primary surgery was compared with the status at second-look laparoscopy.
RESULTS: Patients operated on by laparotomy developed significantly more adhesions at the operated side than patients operated on by laparoscopy (P less than 0.001). Substantially more patients in the laparotomy group underwent adhesiolysis at second-look laparoscopy than did patients in the laparoscopy group. Tubal patency did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic treatment of EP results in less impairment of the pelvic status compared with conventional conservative surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1827075     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54298-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Polymeneas; T Theodosopoulos; A Stamatiadis; E Kourias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

6.  Fibrinolytic capacity in peritoneal fluid after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection: data from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Neudecker; T Junghans; W Raue; S Ziemer; W Schwenk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Adhesion formation with open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an immunologic and histologic study.

Authors:  Gy Szabó; I Mikó; P Nagy; E Bráth; K Peto; I Furka; E M Gamal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

9.  The approach to ovarian dermoids in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Kathleen E O'Neill; Amber R Cooper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 10.  Advances in the Pathogenesis of Adhesion Development: The Role of Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Jimmy Belotte; Suleiman Abuanzeh; Nicole M Fletcher; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.