Literature DB >> 9440402

Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

S Eaker1, R Bergström, A Bergström, H O Adami, O Nyren.   

Abstract

Although self-administered questionnaires are major sources of information in epidemiology, comparatively little has been done to study practical aspects of design and mailing. The objective of this study was to evaluate various measures taken to increase the response rate. A questionnaire was mailed in July 1995 to a random sample (n = 2,000) of the Swedish population aged 20-79 years. Using a randomized factorial study design, the questionnaire and mailing procedures were changed in three ways: preliminary notification, length of the questionnaire, and mention of telephone contact. The overall questionnaire retrieval rate was 49%. Preliminary notification (adjusted odds ratio of receiving a completed questionnaire = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.56 relative to the absence of preliminary notification) and short length of the questionnaire (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48 relative to a long questionnaire) were both independently associated with a higher retrieval rate. Of eight possible combinations, the one comprising preliminary notification, a short questionnaire, and no mention of telephone contact gave the highest retrieval rate, 56%. The lowest retrieval rate, 40%, was observed for the combination of no preliminary notification, a long questionnaire, and mention of telephone contact. Young age, male sex, and urban residence significantly lowered the retrieval rate. Although there was a positive association between the questionnaire retrieval rate and partial nonresponse (missing answers in retrieved questionnaires), the marginal losses due to the latter did not cancel the gains by optimized mailing routines. Old age was the strongest determinant of partial nonresponse. The data provide evidence that design and mailing strategies, as well as demographic characteristics, may greatly influence the response rate of mailed epidemiologic questionnaires.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440402     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  53 in total

1.  National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response.

Authors:  H S Picavet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act.

Authors:  Amy Iversen; Kathleen Liddell; Nicola Fear; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-21

3.  The effect of reminders in a web-based intervention study.

Authors:  Madeleine Svensson; Tobias Svensson; Andreas Wolff Hansen; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Satu Helakorpi; Kirsi Talala; Ville Helasoja; Tuija Martelin; Ritva Prättälä
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Interactive voice response and web-based questionnaires for population-based infectious disease reporting.

Authors:  Christin Bexelius; Hanna Merk; Sven Sandin; Olof Nyrén; Sharon Kühlmann-Berenzon; Annika Linde; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Labour force participation among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A M Chorus; H S Miedema; C J Wevers; S van Der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D.

Authors:  N J A van Exel; W J M Scholte op Reimer; M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Measures of physical activity and their correlates: the Swedish National March Cohort.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Rino Bellocco; Hans-Olov Adami; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects.

Authors:  Bridget J Kelly; Taressa K Fraze; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Are there any correlations between social and hand functions in patients with carpal tunnel release surgery postoperatively?

Authors:  Alfonse Marchie; James Mahoney
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.