Literature DB >> 23732176

The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals--from vision to reality.

Matias S Attene-Ramos1, Nicole Miller, Ruili Huang, Sam Michael, Misha Itkin, Robert J Kavlock, Christopher P Austin, Paul Shinn, Anton Simeonov, Raymond R Tice, Menghang Xia.   

Abstract

Since its establishment in 2008, the US Tox21 inter-agency collaboration has made great progress in developing and evaluating cellular models for the evaluation of environmental chemicals as a proof of principle. Currently, the program has entered its production phase (Tox21 Phase II) focusing initially on the areas of modulation of nuclear receptors and stress response pathways. During Tox21 Phase II, the set of chemicals to be tested has been expanded to nearly 10,000 (10K) compounds and a fully automated screening platform has been implemented. The Tox21 robotic system combined with informatics efforts is capable of screening and profiling the collection of 10K environmental chemicals in triplicate in a week. In this article, we describe the Tox21 screening process, compound library preparation, data processing, and robotic system validation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23732176      PMCID: PMC3771082          DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  19 in total

1.  A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  1999

2.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Compound Management for Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Adam Yasgar; Paul Shinn; Ajit Jadhav; Douglas Auld; Sam Michael; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese; Anton Simeonov
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2008-04

4.  Predictive model of rat reproductive toxicity from ToxCast high throughput screening.

Authors:  Matthew T Martin; Thomas B Knudsen; David M Reif; Keith A Houck; Richard S Judson; Robert J Kavlock; David J Dix
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin Andersen; Henry Anderson; John C Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T Kelsey; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Abby A Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A Scala; Gina M Solomon; Martin Stephens; James Yager; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 6.  The future of toxicity testing: a focus on in vitro methods using a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Sunita J Shukla; Ruili Huang; Christopher P Austin; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data.

Authors:  Nisha S Sipes; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Richard S Judson; Amar V Singh; Kelly J Chandler; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas B Knudsen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Menghang Xia; Christopher P Austin; Ruili Huang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Robert J Kavlock; Christopher P Austin; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Robert Kavlock; Matthew Martin; David Reif; Keith Houck; Thomas Knudsen; Ann Richard; Raymond R Tice; Maurice Whelan; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher Austin; George Daston; Thomas Hartung; John R Fowle; William Wooge; Weida Tong; David Dix
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

View more
  73 in total

1.  A multiparametric organ toxicity predictor for drug discovery.

Authors:  Chirag N Patel; Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar; Rakesh M Rawal; Daxesh P Patel; Frank J Gonzalez; Himanshu A Pandya
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.987

2.  Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Nicholas Ball; Lynea Murphy; Reza Rasoulpour; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Kathryn Z Guyton; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  A systematic evaluation of analogs and automated read-across prediction of estrogenicity: A case study using hindered phenols.

Authors:  Prachi Pradeep; Kamel Mansouri; Grace Patlewicz; Richard Judson
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-01

5.  Workflow for defining reference chemicals for assessing performance of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Russell S Thomas; Nancy Baker; Anita Simha; Xia Meng Howey; Carmen Marable; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Keith A Houck
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 6.  Alternative approaches for identifying acute systemic toxicity: Moving from research to regulatory testing.

Authors:  Jon Hamm; Kristie Sullivan; Amy J Clippinger; Judy Strickland; Shannon Bell; Barun Bhhatarai; Bas Blaauboer; Warren Casey; David Dorman; Anna Forsby; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Sean Gehen; Rabea Graepel; Jon Hotchkiss; Anna Lowit; Joanna Matheson; Elissa Reaves; Louis Scarano; Catherine Sprankle; Jay Tunkel; Dan Wilson; Menghang Xia; Hao Zhu; David Allen
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg; Thomas B Knudsen; Ann M Richard; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Mark Polokoff; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Keith A Houck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Ruili Huang; Suramya Waidyanatha; Paul Shinn; Bradley J Collins; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Christopher M Grulke; Antony J Williams; Ryan R Lougee; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Mahmoud Shobair; Chihae Yang; James F Rathman; Adam Yasgar; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Anton Simeonov; Russell S Thomas; Kevin M Crofton; Richard S Paules; John R Bucher; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Identifying environmental chemicals as agonists of the androgen receptor by using a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Caitlin Lynch; Srilatha Sakamuru; Ruili Huang; Diana A Stavreva; Lyuba Varticovski; Gordon L Hager; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Warren Casey; Richard S Paules; Anton Simeonov; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Channel Interactions and Robust Inference for Ratiometric β-lactamase Assay Data: a Tox21 Library Analysis.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nisha S Sipes; Paul T Anastas
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 8.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.