Literature DB >> 25836969

Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Raja S Settivari1, Nicholas Ball2, Lynea Murphy2, Reza Rasoulpour2, Darrell R Boverhof2, Edward W Carney2.   

Abstract

Interest in applying 21st-century toxicity testing tools for safety assessment of industrial chemicals is growing. Whereas conventional toxicology uses mainly animal-based, descriptive methods, a paradigm shift is emerging in which computational approaches, systems biology, high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays, and high-throughput exposure assessments are beginning to be applied to mechanism-based risk assessments in a time- and resource-efficient fashion. Here we describe recent advances in predictive safety assessment, with a focus on their strategic application to meet the changing demands of the chemical industry and its stakeholders. The opportunities to apply these new approaches is extensive and include screening of new chemicals, informing the design of safer and more sustainable chemical alternatives, filling information gaps on data-poor chemicals already in commerce, strengthening read-across methodology for categories of chemicals sharing similar modes of action, and optimizing the design of reduced-risk product formulations. Finally, we discuss how these predictive approaches dovetail with in vivo integrated testing strategies within repeated-dose regulatory toxicity studies, which are in line with 3Rs principles to refine, reduce, and replace animal testing. Strategic application of these tools is the foundation for informed and efficient safety assessment testing strategies that can be applied at all stages of the product-development process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25836969      PMCID: PMC4382627     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  84 in total

1.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.

Authors:  G Frank Gerberick; Jeff D Vassallo; Ruth E Bailey; Joel G Chaney; Steve W Morrall; Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Agricultural chemical safety assessment: A multisector approach to the modernization of human safety requirements.

Authors:  Neil G Carmichael; Hugh A Barton; Alan R Boobis; Ralph L Cooper; Vicki L Dellarco; Nancy G Doerrer; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; John E Doe; James C Lamb; Timothy P Pastoor
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals.

Authors:  Andreas Natsch; Roger Emter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Framework for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as developmental or reproductive toxicants.

Authors:  Shengde Wu; Joan Fisher; Jorge Naciff; Michael Laufersweiler; Cathy Lester; George Daston; Karen Blackburn
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential.

Authors:  Andreas Natsch; Hans Gfeller
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.

Authors:  Yuko Nukada; Takao Ashikaga; Masaaki Miyazawa; Morihiko Hirota; Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Hitoshi Sasa; Naohiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  A novel cell line, MDA-kb2, that stably expresses an androgen- and glucocorticoid-responsive reporter for the detection of hormone receptor agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Vickie S Wilson; Kathy Bobseine; Christy R Lambright; L E Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Mode of action in relevance of rodent liver tumors to human cancer risk.

Authors:  Michael P Holsapple; Henri C Pitot; Samuel M Cohen; Samuel H Cohen; Alan R Boobis; James E Klaunig; Timothy Pastoor; Vicki L Dellarco; Yvonne P Dragan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers.

Authors:  Andreas Natsch
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Profiling chemicals based on chronic toxicity results from the U.S. EPA ToxRef Database.

Authors:  Matthew T Martin; Richard S Judson; David M Reif; Robert J Kavlock; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment.

Authors:  Maxwell C K Leung; Andrew C Procter; Jared V Goldstone; Jonathan Foox; Robert DeSalle; Carolyn J Mattingly; Mark E Siddall; Alicia R Timme-Laragy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Special issue: global 3Rs efforts - making progress and gaining momentum.

Authors:  Leticia V Medina; Joachim Coenen; Michael D Kastello
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Using liver models generated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for evaluating chemical-induced modifications and disease across liver developmental stages.

Authors:  Celeste K Carberry; Stephen S Ferguson; Adriana S Beltran; Rebecca C Fry; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.685

4.  High-Content Assay Multiplexing for Toxicity Screening in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes and Hepatocytes.

Authors:  Fabian Alexander Grimm; Yasuhiro Iwata; Oksana Sirenko; Michael Bittner; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 5.  The Next Generation of Risk Assessment Multi-Year Study-Highlights of Findings, Applications to Risk Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ila Cote; Melvin E Andersen; Gerald T Ankley; Stanley Barone; Linda S Birnbaum; Kim Boekelheide; Frederic Y Bois; Lyle D Burgoon; Weihsueh A Chiu; Douglas Crawford-Brown; Kevin M Crofton; Michael DeVito; Robert B Devlin; Stephen W Edwards; Kathryn Z Guyton; Dale Hattis; Richard S Judson; Derek Knight; Daniel Krewski; Jason Lambert; Elizabeth Anne Maull; Donna Mendrick; Gregory M Paoli; Chirag Jagdish Patel; Edward J Perkins; Gerald Poje; Christopher J Portier; Ivan Rusyn; Paul A Schulte; Anton Simeonov; Martyn T Smith; Kristina A Thayer; Russell S Thomas; Reuben Thomas; Raymond R Tice; John J Vandenberg; Daniel L Villeneuve; Scott Wesselkamper; Maurice Whelan; Christine Whittaker; Ronald White; Menghang Xia; Carole Yauk; Lauren Zeise; Jay Zhao; Robert S DeWoskin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.