Literature DB >> 22528508

Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling.

Hongmao Sun1, Menghang Xia, Christopher P Austin, Ruili Huang.   

Abstract

The limitations of traditional toxicity testing characterized by high-cost animal models with low-throughput readouts, inconsistent responses, ethical issues, and extrapolability to humans call for alternative strategies for chemical risk assessment. A new strategy using in vitro human cell-based assays has been designed to identify key toxicity pathways and molecular mechanisms leading to the prediction of an in vivo response. The emergence of quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) technology has proved to be an efficient way to decompose complex toxicological end points to specific pathways of targeted organs. In addition, qHTS has made a significant impact on computational toxicology in two aspects. First, the ease of mechanism of action identification brought about by in vitro assays has enhanced the simplicity and effectiveness of machine learning, and second, the high-throughput nature and high reproducibility of qHTS have greatly improved the data quality and increased the quantity of training datasets available for predictive model construction. In this review, the benefits of qHTS routinely used in the US Tox21 program will be highlighted. Quantitative structure-activity relationships models built on traditional in vivo data and new qHTS data will be compared and analyzed. In conjunction with the transition from the pilot phase to the production phase of the Tox21 program, more qHTS data will be made available that will enrich the data pool for predictive toxicology. It is perceivable that new in silico toxicity models based on high-quality qHTS data will achieve unprecedented reliability and robustness, thus becoming a valuable tool for risk assessment and drug discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528508      PMCID: PMC3385826          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9358-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  87 in total

Review 1.  Target-based drug discovery: is something wrong?

Authors:  Frank Sams-Dodd
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Critical review of the role of HTS in drug discovery.

Authors:  Ricardo Macarron
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Some new indexes of cluster validity.

Authors:  J C Bezdek; N R Pal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern       Date:  1998

4.  Compound Management for Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Adam Yasgar; Paul Shinn; Ajit Jadhav; Douglas Auld; Sam Michael; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese; Anton Simeonov
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2008-04

5.  A quantitative high-throughput screen for modulators of IL-6 signaling: a model for interrogating biological networks using chemical libraries.

Authors:  Ronald L Johnson; Ruili Huang; Ajit Jadhav; Noel Southall; Jennifer Wichterman; Ryan MacArthur; Menghang Xia; Kun Bi; John Printen; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-06-19

6.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming.

Authors:  R D King; A Srinivasan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Profiling bioactivity of the ToxCast chemical library using BioMAP primary human cell systems.

Authors:  Keith A Houck; David J Dix; Richard S Judson; Robert J Kavlock; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2009-09-22

Review 9.  The pilot phase of the NIH Chemical Genomics Center.

Authors:  Craig J Thomas; Douglas S Auld; Ruili Huang; Wenwei Huang; Ajit Jadhav; Ronald L Johnson; William Leister; David J Maloney; Juan J Marugan; Sam Michael; Anton Simeonov; Noel Southall; Menghang Xia; Wei Zheng; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Comprehensive characterization of cytochrome P450 isozyme selectivity across chemical libraries.

Authors:  Henrike Veith; Noel Southall; Ruili Huang; Tim James; Darren Fayne; Natalia Artemenko; Min Shen; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin; David G Lloyd; Douglas S Auld
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  25 in total

1.  Three-dimensional cell culturing by magnetic levitation.

Authors:  William L Haisler; David M Timm; Jacob A Gage; Hubert Tseng; T C Killian; Glauco R Souza
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  In vitro platforms for evaluating liver toxicity.

Authors:  Shyam Sundhar Bale; Lawrence Vernetti; Nina Senutovitch; Rohit Jindal; Manjunath Hegde; Albert Gough; William J McCarty; Ahmet Bakan; Abhinav Bhushan; Tong Ying Shun; Inna Golberg; Richard DeBiasio; Berk Osman Usta; D Lansing Taylor; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-04-24

3.  Prediction of hERG Liability - Using SVM Classification, Bootstrapping and Jackknifing.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Ruili Huang; Menghang Xia; Sampada Shahane; Noel Southall; Yuhong Wang
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.353

4.  Kinetics of Glutathione Depletion and Antioxidant Gene Expression as Indicators of Chemical Modes of Action Assessed in Vitro in Mouse Hepatocytes with Enhanced Glutathione Synthesis.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Dianne Botta; Collin C White; Stefanie C Schmuck; Matthew Winfough; Christopher M Schaupp; Evan P Gallagher; Bryan W Brooks; Edward Spencer Williams; Philip Coish; Paul T Anastas; Adelina Voutchkova-Kostal; Jakub Kostal; Terrance J Kavanagh
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Omics-Based Platform for Studying Chemical Toxicity Using Stem Cells.

Authors:  Yan Han; Jinghua Zhao; Ruili Huang; Menghang Xia; Daojing Wang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainties in Clearance and Exposure When Prioritizing Chemicals Screened in High-Throughput Assays.

Authors:  Jeremy A Leonard; Ashley Sobel Leonard; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Edwards; Jingtao Lu; Steven Scholle; Phillip Key; Maxwell Winter; Kristin Isaacs; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals--from vision to reality.

Authors:  Matias S Attene-Ramos; Nicole Miller; Ruili Huang; Sam Michael; Misha Itkin; Robert J Kavlock; Christopher P Austin; Paul Shinn; Anton Simeonov; Raymond R Tice; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 7.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.