Literature DB >> 30057968

A systematic evaluation of analogs and automated read-across prediction of estrogenicity: A case study using hindered phenols.

Prachi Pradeep1,2, Kamel Mansouri1,2, Grace Patlewicz2, Richard Judson2.   

Abstract

Read-across is an important data gap filling technique used within category and analog approaches for regulatory hazard identification and risk assessment. Although much technical guidance is available that describes how to develop category/analog approaches, practical principles to evaluate and substantiate analog validity (suitability) are still lacking. This case study uses hindered phenols as an example chemical class to determine: (1) the capability of three structure fingerprint/descriptor methods (PubChem, ToxPrints and MoSS MCSS) to identify analogs for read-across to predict Estrogen Receptor (ER) binding activity and, (2) the utility of data confidence measures, physicochemical properties, and chemical R-group properties as filters to improve ER binding predictions. The training dataset comprised 462 hindered phenols and 257 non- hindered phenols. For each chemical of interest (target), source analogs were identified from two datasets (hindered and non-hindered phenols) that had been characterized by a fingerprint/descriptor method and by two cut-offs: (1) minimum similarity distance (range: 0.1 - 0.9) and, (2) N closest analogs (range: 1 - 10). Analogs were then filtered using: (1) physicochemical properties of the phenol (termed global filtering) and, (2) physicochemical properties of the R-groups neighboring the active hydroxyl group (termed local filtering). A read-across prediction was made for each target chemical on the basis of a majority vote of the N closest analogs. The results demonstrate that: (1) concordance in ER activity increases with structural similarity, regardless of the structure fingerprint/descriptor method, (2) increased data confidence significantly improves read-across predictions, and (3) filtering analogs using global and local properties can help identify more suitable analogs. This case study illustrates that the quality of the underlying experimental data and use of endpoint relevant chemical descriptors to evaluate source analogs are critical to achieving robust read-across predictions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Read-across; analog evaluation; analog identification; estrogen receptor (ER) binding; quantitative uncertainty analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 30057968      PMCID: PMC6060417          DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2017.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Toxicol        ISSN: 2468-1113


  24 in total

1.  New publicly available chemical query language, CSRML, to support chemotype representations for application to data mining and modeling.

Authors:  Chihae Yang; Aleksey Tarkhov; Jörg Marusczyk; Bruno Bienfait; Johann Gasteiger; Thomas Kleinoeder; Tomasz Magdziarz; Oliver Sacher; Christof H Schwab; Johannes Schwoebel; Lothar Terfloth; Kirk Arvidson; Ann Richard; Andrew Worth; James Rathman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments.

Authors:  Shengde Wu; Karen Blackburn; Jack Amburgey; Joanna Jaworska; Thomas Federle
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Structural features of alkylphenolic chemicals associated with estrogenic activity.

Authors:  E J Routledge; J P Sumpter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity.

Authors:  T W Schultz; P Amcoff; E Berggren; F Gautier; M Klaric; D J Knight; C Mahony; M Schwarz; A White; M T D Cronin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Read-across approaches--misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Nicholas Ball; Richard A Becker; Ewan D Booth; Mark T D Cronin; Dinant Kroese; David Steup; Ben van Ravenzwaay; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty.

Authors:  Karen Blackburn; Sharon B Stuard
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Endocrine disruptors and human health--is there a problem? An update.

Authors:  S H Safe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Aleksandra Rybacka; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Alexey Zakharov; Andrew Worth; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Denis Fourches; Dragos Horvath; Emilio Benfenati; Eugene Muratov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Francesca Grisoni; Giuseppe F Mangiatordi; Giuseppina M Incisivo; Huixiao Hong; Hui W Ng; Igor V Tetko; Ilya Balabin; Jayaram Kancherla; Jie Shen; Julien Burton; Marc Nicklaus; Matteo Cassotti; Nikolai G Nikolov; Orazio Nicolotti; Patrik L Andersson; Qingda Zang; Regina Politi; Richard D Beger; Roberto Todeschini; Ruili Huang; Sherif Farag; Sine A Rosenberg; Svetoslav Slavov; Xin Hu; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Profiling of the Tox21 10K compound library for agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway.

Authors:  Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Matt T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Warren Casey; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Keith R Shockley; Patricia Ceger; Jennifer Fostel; Kristine L Witt; Weida Tong; Daniel M Rotroff; Tongan Zhao; Paul Shinn; Anton Simeonov; David J Dix; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Predicting estrogen receptor activation by a group of substituted phenols: An integrated approach to testing and assessment case study.

Authors:  Francina Webster; Matthew Gagné; Grace Patlewicz; Prachi Pradeep; Nicholas Trefiak; Richard S Judson; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Extending the Generalised Read-Across approach (GenRA): A systematic analysis of the impact of physicochemical property information on read-across performance.

Authors:  George Helman; Imran Shah; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018

Review 3.  In silico toxicology: From structure-activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Jennifer Hemmerich; Gerhard F Ecker
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

4.  Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.

Authors:  Katie Paul Friedman; Matthew Gagne; Lit-Hsin Loo; Panagiotis Karamertzanis; Tatiana Netzeva; Tomasz Sobanski; Jill A Franzosa; Ann M Richard; Ryan R Lougee; Andrea Gissi; Jia-Ying Joey Lee; Michelle Angrish; Jean Lou Dorne; Stiven Foster; Kathleen Raffaele; Tina Bahadori; Maureen R Gwinn; Jason Lambert; Maurice Whelan; Mike Rasenberg; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The in vitro assessment of the toxicity of volatile, oxidisable, redox-cycling compounds: phenols as an example.

Authors:  Laia Tolosa; Teresa Martínez-Sena; Johannes P Schimming; Erika Moro; Sylvia E Escher; Bas Ter Braak; Bob van der Water; M A Miranda; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; José V Castell
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.