Literature DB >> 21873373

Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data.

Nisha S Sipes1, Matthew T Martin, David M Reif, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Richard S Judson, Amar V Singh, Kelly J Chandler, David J Dix, Robert J Kavlock, Thomas B Knudsen.   

Abstract

Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast project is profiling the in vitro bioactivity of chemicals to assess pathway-level and cell-based signatures that correlate with observed in vivo toxicity. We hypothesized that developmental toxicity in guideline animal studies captured in the ToxRefDB database would correlate with cell-based and cell-free in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) data to reveal meaningful mechanistic relationships and provide models identifying chemicals with the potential to cause developmental toxicity. To test this hypothesis, we built statistical associations based on HTS and in vivo developmental toxicity data from ToxRefDB. Univariate associations were used to filter HTS assays based on statistical correlation with distinct in vivo endpoint. This revealed 423 total associations with distinctly different patterns for rat (301 associations) and rabbit (122 associations) across multiple HTS assay platforms. From these associations, linear discriminant analysis with cross-validation was used to build the models. Species-specific models of predicted developmental toxicity revealed strong balanced accuracy (> 70%) and unique correlations between assay targets such as transforming growth factor beta, retinoic acid receptor, and G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in the rat and inflammatory signals, such as interleukins (IL) (IL1a and IL8) and chemokines (CCL2), in the rabbit. Species-specific toxicity endpoints were associated with one another through common Gene Ontology biological processes, such as cleft palate to urogenital defects through placenta and embryonic development. This work indicates the utility of HTS assays for developing pathway-level models predictive of developmental toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873373     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  55 in total

Review 1.  Alternative models in developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Hyung-yul Lee; Amy L Inselman; Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Deborah K Hansen
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  Predictive modeling of chemical hazard by integrating numerical descriptors of chemical structures and short-term toxicity assay data.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Sedykh; Yen Low; Kathryn Z Guyton; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment.

Authors:  Maxwell C K Leung; Andrew C Procter; Jared V Goldstone; Jonathan Foox; Robert DeSalle; Carolyn J Mattingly; Mark E Siddall; Alicia R Timme-Laragy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Mechanism-Driven Read-Across of Chemical Hepatotoxicants Based on Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Wenyi Wang; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Nicholas Ball; Lynea Murphy; Reza Rasoulpour; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 6.  Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.

Authors:  Sean Watford; Stephen Edwards; Michelle Angrish; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  An Intuitive Approach for Predicting Potential Human Health Risk with the Tox21 10k Library.

Authors:  Nisha S Sipes; John F Wambaugh; Robert Pearce; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Andrew J Shapiro; Daniel Svoboda; Michael J DeVito; Stephen S Ferguson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg; Thomas B Knudsen; Ann M Richard; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Mark Polokoff; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Keith A Houck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 10.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.