Literature DB >> 10615451

Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia.

M Rosenfield1, B Gilmartin.   

Abstract

Accommodative adaptation, resulting from the sustained output of slow blur-driven accommodation during the course of a sustained near-vision task, has generally been assessed under open-loop conditions. This study examined whether adaptation influences closed-loop accommodation during the course of a sustained near-vision task. Accommodative adaptation was assessed in 18 fully-corrected subjects by comparing pre- and post-task values of dark accommodation recorded objectively with an infra-red optometer. Subjects performed a continuous 10 min binocular near-vision task at a viewing distance of 33 cm, with the within-task accommodative response being assessed at 1 min intervals during this period. Subjects were categorized into adaptors (N = 11) and non-adaptors (N = 7) on the basis of whether their initial 10 sec post-task adaptation exceeded +0.30D. The adapting group exhibited a significant decline in the lag of accommodation during the first 3 min of the near-task, whereas no significant change in the within-task response over time was observed in the non-adapting group. These results indicate that accommodative adaptation increases the accuracy of the within-task, closed-loop accommodative response. Furthermore, we speculate that a deficit in accommodative adaptation, being accompanied by increased retinal defocus during near fixation, may contribute to the development of nearwork-induced myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615451     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

1.  Measuring near-induced transient myopia in college students with visual discomfort.

Authors:  Eric Borsting; Chinatsu Tosha; Chris Chase; William H Ridder
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Comparison of three monocular methods for measuring accommodative stimulus-response curves.

Authors:  Yunyun Chen; Wanqing Jin; Zhili Zheng; Chuanchuan Zhang; Huiling Lin; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Hao Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 6.  A Review of Current Concepts of the Etiology and Treatment of Myopia.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cooper; Andrei V Tkatchenko
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.018

7.  Cerebral Blood Flow Alterations in High Myopia: An Arterial Spin Labeling Study.

Authors:  Huihui Wang; Shanshan Li; Xi Chen; Yanling Wang; Jing Li; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.