Literature DB >> 33828740

Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Miroslav Dostalek1,2, Karel Fliegel3, Ladislav Dusek4, Tomas Lukes3,5, Jan Hejda6, Michaela Duchackova1,6, Jiri Hozman6, Rudolf Autrata7.   

Abstract

The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular fusion efficiency; binocular rivalry; blur balance; blur conflict; natural image statistics; signal strength; suppression; vergence demand

Year:  2019        PMID: 33828740      PMCID: PMC7880136          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.12.4.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  39 in total

Review 1.  Integrated model of visual processing.

Authors:  J Bullier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

2.  Induction masking--a study of some inhibitory interactions during dichoptic viewing.

Authors:  R V Abadi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual functions and interocular interactions in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia.

Authors:  Xin Jie Lai; Jack Alexander; Mingguang He; Zhikuan Yang; Catherine Suttle
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Investigation of interocular blur suppression using luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise stimuli.

Authors:  Akash S Chima; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions.

Authors:  G E Legge
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-06

7.  Is Suppression Just Normal Dichoptic Masking? Suprathreshold Considerations.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Bistable percepts in the brain: FMRI contrasts monocular pattern rivalry and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Samuel Jessula; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Amblyopia treatment of adults with dichoptic training using the virtual reality oculus rift head mounted display: preliminary results.

Authors:  Peter Žiak; Anders Holm; Juraj Halička; Peter Mojžiš; David P Piñero
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.