Literature DB >> 27510227

[Preoperative auditory evaluation and postoperative follow-up in cochlear implantees : The role of objective measures].

W Shehata-Dieler1, W Großmann2.   

Abstract

The primary diagnostic aim prior to cochlear implantation is establishment of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary diagnosis, in order to subsequently begin therapy as early as possible. Audiological evaluation prior to implantation employs a test battery-approach, including subjective and objective procedures. Objective measures show high reliability and therefore play a major role in the diagnosis of difficult-to-test subjects such as infants and young children. During postoperative follow-up, objective measures offer a valid method for analyzing the effects of different stimuli on the auditory system. Particularly in infants, children, and uncooperative patients, the results of these tests enable the speech processor settings to be optimized, the hearing benefit to be assessed, and treatment to be adapted accordingly. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) offer an excellent test/retest and inter-/intrarater reliability and validity, and are the most commonly used method for objective hearing threshold estimation and evaluation of the functional integrity of the lower auditory pathway. The use of narrow-band stimuli allows frequency-specific threshold estimation; analysis of stationary auditory steady state potentials (ASSR) adds the advantages of automated objective detection. Electrocochleography and electrically evoked ABR give valuable information in special cases. The use of cortical potentials (CAEP) in response to speech stimuli is quite promising, although the high response variability currently limits this method's clinical application. An audiological test-battery approach combining the results of subjective and objective measures leads to significantly increased reliability of preoperative diagnosis and postoperative follow-up in cochlear implantees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory pathways; Cochlear implant; Cochlear microphonic potentials; Evoked potentials, auditory, brainstem

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27510227     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0214-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  29 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  New clicklike stimuli for hearing testing.

Authors:  Mario Cebulla; Ekkehard Stürzebecher; Claus Elberling; Jochen Müller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don; Mario Cebulla; Ekkehard Stürzebecher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; M Don; M D Waring; B Kwong; J Cunningham; P Trautwein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  N Kraus; A G Micco; D B Koch; T McGee; T Carrell; A Sharma; R J Wiet; C Z Weingarten
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Electrocochleography in children with auditory synaptopathy/neuropathy: diagnostic findings and characteristic parameters.

Authors:  Konrad Johannes Stuermer; Dirk Beutner; Astrid Foerst; Moritz Hahn; Ruth Lang-Roth; Martin Walger
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Electrocochleography in auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Rosamaria Santarelli; Edoardo Arslan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  CENTRAL AUDTIORY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF THE P1 CAEP BIOMARKER IN HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN WITH MULTIPLE DISABILITIES.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Hannah Glick; Julia Campbell; Allison Biever
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2013-09

10.  Use of the auditory brainstem responses by prematures and newborns infants.

Authors:  P A Despland; R Galambos
Journal:  Neuropadiatrie       Date:  1980-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants and cognitive abilities].

Authors:  S Knopke; H Olze
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.284

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.