Literature DB >> 29508662

A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.

Chin-Tuan Tan1,2, Brett A Martin2, Mario A Svirsky3.   

Abstract

The overall goal of this study was to identify an objective physiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in unilaterally implanted cochlear implant (CI) participants with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear. Electrical and acoustic stimuli were presented in a continuously alternating fashion across ears. The acoustic stimulus and the electrical stimulus were either matched or mismatched in pitch. Auditory evoked potentials were obtained from nine CI users. Results indicated that N1 latency was stimulus-dependent, decreasing when the acoustic frequency of the tone presented to the non-implanted ear was increased. More importantly, there was an additional decrease in N1 latency in the pitch-matched condition. These results indicate the potential utility of N1 latency as an index of pitch matching in CI users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potential; Electric-acoustic pitch matching; N1 latency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508662      PMCID: PMC6123823          DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1442126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  42 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  A J Beynon; A F M Snik; D F Stegeman; P van den Broek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.

Authors:  Guy Lightfoot; Vicki Kennedy
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds.

Authors:  K L Tremblay; L Friesen; B A Martin; R Wright
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Brokx; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.

Authors:  J M Ostroff; B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.

Authors:  Ingyu Chun; Curtis J Billings; Christi W Miller; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 9.  Anatomy and physiology of binaural hearing.

Authors:  D R Moore
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991

10.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships.

Authors:  T W Picton; D L Woods; G B Proulx
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.