Literature DB >> 23726970

Conserved mechanisms of vocalization coding in mammalian and songbird auditory midbrain.

Sarah M N Woolley1, Christine V Portfors.   

Abstract

The ubiquity of social vocalizations among animals provides the opportunity to identify conserved mechanisms of auditory processing that subserve communication. Identifying auditory coding properties that are shared across vocal communicators will provide insight into how human auditory processing leads to speech perception. Here, we compare auditory response properties and neural coding of social vocalizations in auditory midbrain neurons of mammalian and avian vocal communicators. The auditory midbrain is a nexus of auditory processing because it receives and integrates information from multiple parallel pathways and provides the ascending auditory input to the thalamus. The auditory midbrain is also the first region in the ascending auditory system where neurons show complex tuning properties that are correlated with the acoustics of social vocalizations. Single unit studies in mice, bats and zebra finches reveal shared principles of auditory coding including tonotopy, excitatory and inhibitory interactions that shape responses to vocal signals, nonlinear response properties that are important for auditory coding of social vocalizations and modulation tuning. Additionally, single neuron responses in the mouse and songbird midbrain are reliable, selective for specific syllables, and rely on spike timing for neural discrimination of distinct vocalizations. We propose that future research on auditory coding of vocalizations in mouse and songbird midbrain neurons adopt similar experimental and analytical approaches so that conserved principles of vocalization coding may be distinguished from those that are specialized for each species. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Communication Sounds and the Brain: New Directions and Perspectives".
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A1; CF; DCN; DNLL; IC; ICc; INLL; LLD; LLI; LLV; LSO; MGB; MLd; MSO; NA; NL; NM; OC; Ov; RA; SON; SPN; VCN; VNLL; central nucleus of the inferior colliculus; characteristic frequency; dB; decibels; dorsal cochlear nucleus; dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus; inferior colliculus; intermediate nucleus of the lateral lemniscus; kHz; kilohertz; lateral dorsal mesencephalon; lateral superior olive; medial geniculate body; medial superior olive; millisecond; ms; nucleus angularis; nucleus laminaris; nucleus magnocellularis; nucleus ovoidalis; olivocochlear nucleus; primary auditory cortex; robust nucleus of the arcopallium; superior olivary nucleus; superior paraolivary nucleus; ventral cochlear nucleus; ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726970      PMCID: PMC3818289          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  129 in total

1.  On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech.

Authors:  R E Remez; J S Pardo; R L Piorkowski; P E Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  Responses to combinations of tones in the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus.

Authors:  C V Portfors; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

3.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Syllable acoustics, temporal patterns, and call composition vary with behavioral context in Mexican free-tailed bats.

Authors:  Kirsten M Bohn; Barbara Schmidt-French; Sean T Ma; George D Pollak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Cyrus P Billimoria; Benjamin J Kraus; Rajiv Narayan; Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Ultrasonic vocalizations: a tool for behavioural phenotyping of mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Scattoni; Jacqueline Crawley; Laura Ricceri
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Perceptual learning evidence for tuning to spectrotemporal modulation in the human auditory system.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; David A Eddins; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Adeen Flinker; Shihab A Shamma; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  24 in total

1.  Meaning in the avian auditory cortex: neural representation of communication calls.

Authors:  Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Habitat-related differences in auditory processing of complex tones and vocal signal properties in four songbirds.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Alejandro Vélez; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Kamal Sen; Edwin W Rubel; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  MUPET-Mouse Ultrasonic Profile ExTraction: A Signal Processing Tool for Rapid and Unsupervised Analysis of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.

Authors:  Maarten Van Segbroeck; Allison T Knoll; Pat Levitt; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  GABAA receptors contribute more to rate than temporal coding in the IC of awake mice.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Elena J Mahrt; Warren Bakay; Cameron Elde; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams; Johanna Forst; Matthew J Mender; Erikson G Neilans; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-20

9.  Differential Inhibitory Configurations Segregate Frequency Selectivity in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus.

Authors:  Jeongyoon Lee; Jeff Lin; Cal Rabang; Guangying K Wu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.