Literature DB >> 18562600

Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Cyrus P Billimoria1, Benjamin J Kraus, Rajiv Narayan, Ross K Maddox, Kamal Sen.   

Abstract

Intensity variation poses a fundamental problem for sensory discrimination because changes in the response of sensory neurons as a result of stimulus identity, e.g., a change in the identity of the speaker uttering a word, can potentially be confused with changes resulting from stimulus intensity, for example, the loudness of the utterance. Here we report on the responses of neurons in field L, the primary auditory cortex homolog in songbirds, which allow for accurate discrimination of birdsongs that is invariant to intensity changes over a large range. Such neurons comprise a subset of a population that is highly diverse, in terms of both discrimination accuracy and intensity sensitivity. We find that the neurons with a high degree of invariance also display a high discrimination performance, and that the degree of invariance is significantly correlated with the reproducibility of spike timing on a short time scale and the temporal sparseness of spiking activity. Our results indicate that a temporally sparse spike timing-based code at a primary cortical stage can provide a substrate for intensity-invariant discrimination of natural sounds.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562600      PMCID: PMC2730838          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0961-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

Review 1.  Models of object recognition.

Authors:  M Riesenhuber; T Poggio
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Hartmut Schütze; Astrid Franz; Olga Kolesnikova; Martin B Stemmler; Bernhard Ronacher; Andreas V M Herz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds.

Authors:  Rajiv Narayan; Gilberto Graña; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Recognition by variance: learning rules for spatiotemporal patterns.

Authors:  Omri Barak; Misha Tsodyks
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system.

Authors:  Mark Stopfer; Vivek Jayaraman; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Cytoarchitectonic organization and morphology of cells of the field L complex in male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata).

Authors:  E S Fortune; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  31 in total

1.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Peter L Rauske; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Analyzing variability in neural responses to complex natural sounds in the awake songbird.

Authors:  Gilberto David Graña; Cyrus P Billimoria; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A biologically plausible computational model for auditory object recognition.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Cyrus P Billimoria; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Auditory forebrain neurons track temporal features of time-warped natural stimuli.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-16

7.  Intensity invariance properties of auditory neurons compared to the statistics of relevant natural signals in grasshoppers.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Gerroth Weschke; Astrid Vogel; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Auditory cortical processing in real-world listening: the auditory system going real.

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Jennifer Bizley; Shihab A Shamma; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Kamal Sen; Edwin W Rubel; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A Decline in Response Variability Improves Neural Signal Detection during Auditory Task Performance.

Authors:  Gardiner von Trapp; Bradley N Buran; Kamal Sen; Malcolm N Semple; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.