| Literature DB >> 23725633 |
Matthew R Hayward1, Vincent A A Jansen, Martin J Woodward.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent isolation of Salmonella enterica sub. enterica serovars Derby and Mbandaka from livestock in the UK and USA little is known about the biological processes maintaining their prevalence. Statistics for Salmonella isolations from livestock production in the UK show that S. Derby is most commonly associated with pigs and turkeys and S. Mbandaka with cattle and chickens. Here we compare the first sequenced genomes of S. Derby and S. Mbandaka as a basis for further analysis of the potential host adaptations that contribute to their distinct host species distributions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23725633 PMCID: PMC3680342 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Chromosome annotation maps of newly sequenced isolates. A) S. Derby D1, B) S. Derby D2, C) S. Mbandaka M1 and D) S. Mbandaka M2. The two outer tracks represent ORFs identified by RAST in forward and reverse DNA strands. The third and fourth tracks display non-coding RNAs in forward and reverse confirmation. The fifth track shows, SPI-23 (green) in maps A and B, prophage (mauve), Salmonella pathogenicity islands (purple) and CRISPR operons (burgundy). The sixth track shows the GC base composition under a 1000bp moving window. The additional red track outside of maps C and D indicates the location of a unique 860 kbp sequence inversion.
Comparison of previously published genomic islands that distinguish between D1, D2, M1 and M2 in their gene complement
| CS54 | - | + | + | + | Ribosome association toxin | No role in virulence [ | |
| - | + | + | + | Outer membrane protein | No role in virulence [ | ||
| - | + | + | + | Invasin-like | Colonising peyers patch (Mouse) [ | ||
| SPI-1 | STM2901 | - | - | + | + | Putative cytoplasmic protein | NI [ |
| STM2902 | - | - | + | + | Putative cytoplasmic protein | NI [ | |
| STM2903 | - | - | + | + | Putative cytoplasmic protein | NI [ | |
| SC2837 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| SC2838 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| SPI-3 | Pseudo | + | + | - | - | NI | NI [ |
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial like protein | Stress response [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial like protein | NI [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial like protein | NI [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial like protein | NI [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Porin/ fimbrial assembly | High temperature resistance above 50°C [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Pilin chaperone | Expressed with increasing temp above 22°C [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Pilin chaperone | NI [ | ||
| Pseudo | + | + | - | - | NI | NI [ | |
| - | - | + | + | Cytoplasmic protein | Epithelial migration [ | ||
| STY4039 | - | - | + | + | EnvR binding site | No role in virulence [ | |
| SPI-6 | STY0296 | + | + | - | - | Hypothetical protein | No role in virulence [ |
| STY0300 ( | - | - | + | + | Transcription factor | Regulates expression of SPI1 and flagellum genes [ | |
| STY0301 ( | - | - | + | + | Outer membrane usher protein | Up regulated during intracellular replication [ | |
| STY0302 ( | - | - | + | + | Hemolysin-coregulated protein | NI [ | |
| STY0303 ( | - | - | + | + | Outer membrane lipoprotein | Need for Type VI secretion, biofilm formation [ | |
| STY0307 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| STY0311 | - | - | + | + | Mannosyl-glycoprotein | NI [ | |
| STY0312 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| STY0319 | - | - | + | + | Rhs-family protein | NI [ | |
| STY0320 | - | - | + | + | Putative cytoplasmic protein | NI [ | |
| STY0321 | - | - | + | + | Rhs1 protein | NI [ | |
| STY0322 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| STY0323 | - | - | + | + | Hypothetical protein | NI [ | |
| - | - | + | + | Fimibrial usher protein | No effect in virulence in mice [ | ||
| Pseudo | - | - | + | + | NI | NI [ | |
| - | - | + | + | Periplasmic fimbrial chaperone protein | NI [ | ||
| - | - | + | + | Outer membrane usher protein | Up regulated during intracellular replication [ | ||
| - | - | + | + | Fimibrial usher protein | No effect in virulence in mice [ | ||
| STY0338 | - | - | + | + | Periplasmic binding protein | NI [ | |
| Pseudo | - | - | + | + | NI | NI [ | |
| - | - | + | + | HTH transcription factor | No effect on virulence in mice [ | ||
| NI | + | + | - | - | Rhs-family protein | NI | |
| NI | + | + | - | - | Rhs-family protein | NI | |
| NI | + | + | - | - | Phosphotriesterase | NI | |
| NI | + | + | - | - | Hypothetical protein | NI | |
| NI | + | + | - | - | Hypothetical protein | NI | |
| orf7 ( | + | + | - | - | SinR-like, HTH transcription factor | NI [ | |
| NI | + | + | - | - | Putative cytoplasmic protein | NI | |
| Pseudo | + | + | - | - | NI | NI | |
| Pseudo | + | + | - | - | NI | NI | |
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial protein | Increased expression with increased salinity, non virulence in INT-407 cells [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial protein | Increased IgG-tcfB in patients with | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial usher protein | No effect on adhesion to mice monolayers [ | ||
| + | + | - | - | Fimbrial protein | NI [ | ||
| - | + | - | - | DNA polymerase 3 epsilon subunit ribonuclease H | NI [ | ||
| NI | - | + | - | - | Ribonuclease HI | NI | |
| - | + | - | - | Hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase | methylglyoxal degradation [ | ||
| - | + | - | - | Membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase D | Enchance virulence in | ||
| NI | - | + | - | - | Methyltransferase UbiE/COQ5 | Ubiquinone/ menaquinone biosynthesis [ | |
| - | + | - | - | AP like endonuclease | Egg albumen resistance [ | ||
| NI | - | + | - | - | Putative drug efflux protein | NI | |
| NI | - | + | - | - | Hypothetical oxidoreductase | NI | |
| - | + | - | - | 2, 5 didehydrogluconate reductase B | Detoxing response to hyperosmotic solution [ |
SPI-6 distinguishes between S. Derby and S. Mbandaka strains. This island has also been extensively studied for a role in pathogenicity, and displays the largest amount of diversity in gene complement between S. Derby and S. Mbandaka. Interestingly the majority of the diversity in SPI gene complement between S. Derby and S. Mbandaka is additional genes in S. Derby isolates. NI signifies a lack of information on the ORF.
Figure 2SPI-23 from Derby D1 and D2. SPI-23 is a putative pathogenicity island, in S. Derby it is 37 Kb long and contains 42 ORFS. Gene colours reflect putative function; orange, identifies a phage protein, blue a novel hypothetical protein, light pink identifies pili associated proteins, green a DNA binding protein, yellow a membrane protein, brown a regulatory protein and grey a conserved hypothetical protein. Dark pink identifies an ORF that was predicted to be an effector protein by SIEVE with a p-value of 0.05 or lower.
Comparison of the annotation results for SPI-23 from different serovars
| Phage intergrase | 0.27 | Phage intergrase | −0.05 | Phage intergrase | 0.27 | Phage intergrase | 0.27 | |
| Exported protein | 1.56 | Exported protein | 1.56 | Exported protein | 1.40 | Exported protein | 1.56 | |
| No Matches | 1.43 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.84 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | threonine operon leader | 1.09 | threonine operon leader | 1.09 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.21 | hypothetical protein | 0.73 | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.68 | hypothetical protein | 2.06 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 2.44 | hypothetical protein | 2.44 | |
| - | - | RelA/SpoT | 0.25 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.71 | - | - | - | - | |
| prepilin-type N- cleavage/methylation domain protein | 0.90 | prepilin-type N- cleavage/methylation domain protein | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | Pil-v like | 1.82 | Pil-v like | 1.82 | |
| - | - | - | - | Pil-v like | 0.75 | Pil-v like | 0.75 | |
| Putative type 4 pilin protein | 1.36 | Putative type 4 pilin protein | 1.03 | Putative type 4 pilin protein | 1.36 | Putative type 4 pilin protein | 1.36 | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 1.44 | Conserved Hypothetical | 1.71 | Conserved Hypothetical | 2.40 | Conserved Hypothetical | 1.66 | |
| Hypothetical 91% homology | 0.38 | Hypothetical 91% homology | 0.38 | Hypothetical 91% homology | 1.44 | Hypothetical 91% homology | 0.33 | |
| No Matches | 1.51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.98 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.49 | hypothetical protein | 0.49 | |
| No Matches | 1.35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative lipoprotein (94%) | −0.24 | Putative lipoprotein (94%) | −0.05 | Putative lipoprotein (94%) | 1.22 | Putative lipoprotein (94%) | 1.22 | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.69 | hypothetical protein | 0.89 | hypothetical protein | 2.61 | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.22 | hypothetical protein | 0.30 | hypothetical protein | −0.34 | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.17 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.46 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.52 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.98 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.98 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.36 | hypothetical protein | 1.30 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.70 | hypothetical protein | 0.70 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.16 | hypothetical protein | 0.16 | |
| No Matches | 2.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.82 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.75 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hypothetical | 0.39 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative membrane protein (89%) | 1.44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Function | 2.06 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.66 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 0.82 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| No Matches | 1.92 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hypothetical 88% | 1.58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Pentatricopetide 90% | 0.85 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative DNA-binding protein | 0.27 | Putative DNA-binding protein | 1.40 | Putative DNA-binding protein | 1.48 | Putative DNA-binding protein | 1.48 | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 0.68 | Conserved Hypothetical | 0.27 | Conserved Hypothetical | 1.49 | Conserved Hypothetical | 0.27 | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 1.33 | Conserved Hypothetical | 0.68 | Conserved Hypothetical | 0.85 | Conserved Hypothetical | 0.85 | |
| putative DNA-binding protein (histone-like protein hlp-II) | 1.31 | putative DNA-binding protein (histone-like protein hlp-II) | 1.43 | putative DNA-binding protein (histone-like protein hlp-II) | 0.25 | putative DNA-binding protein (histone-like protein hlp-II) | 0.25 | |
| - | - | - | - | DNA-binding protein H-NS | 0.57 | DNA-binding protein H-NS | 0.68 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.33 | hypothetical protein | 1.33 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.31 | hypothetical protein | 1.31 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.98 | hypothetical protein | 0.98 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.18 | hypothetical protein | 1.07 | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.93 | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.73 | hypothetical protein | 0.73 | |
| Partial putative DNA-binding protein (histone-like protein hlp-II) | 0.98 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative membrane protein | 0.93 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 0.73 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Conserved Hypothetical | 2.23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hypothetical 90% | 1.41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative phage regulatory protein | 0.74 | Putative phage regulatory protein | 1.90 | Putative phage regulatory protein | 1.71 | Putative phage regulatory protein | 1.71 | |
| Hypothetical 99% | −0.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.71 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Putative endoprotease 99% | 1.81 | Putative endoprotease 99% | 1.81 | Putative endoprotease 99% | 1.81 | Putative endoprotease 99% | 1.81 | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | −0.14 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | TPR domain protein, putative component of TonB system | 0.56 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.49 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.75 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | putative P4-type integrase | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.93 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | −0.05 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | hypothetical protein | 0.53 | - | - | - | - |
This Table shows the comparative structure and gene content of SPI-23 in the chromosome of different serovars. SIEVE Z-scores above 1.5 indicate a potential type III effector protein. Functions are taken from RAST, or where no function was given, the highest hit on NCBI BLASTn. Provisional gene names are given for ORFs in SPI-23 of S. Derby; this does not conflict with existing gene names, which have been used where possible.
Figure 3SPI-23 four way nucleotide comparison. Four way comparison of the nucleotide sequence of SPI-23 from S. Derby D1, S. Agona SL483, S. Dublin CT02021853 and S. Gallinarum RKS5078. S. Derby D1 possess the largest SPI-23 (37 Kb) island of the sequenced strains available on NCBI genome and the most novel in nucleotide sequence. Over 60% of the nucleotide sequence of SPI-23 in S. Derby D1 is unique and contains no entry on NCBI nucleotide database.