OBJECTIVES: To compare the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion and perfusion characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and post-chemoradiation fibrosis to aid in their differentiation. METHODS: Fifty-three (64 %) patients with newly diagnosed NPC and 30 (36 %) patients with biopsy-proven post-chemoradiation fibrosis were recruited into tumour and fibrosis groups respectively. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed using 13 b values (0-1,000 s/mm(2)). Their respective IVIM parameters (D, pure diffusion; f, perfusion fraction; D, pseudodiffusion coefficient) were obtained. RESULTS: D and f were significantly lower in NPC (D = 0.752 ± 0.194 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P <0.001; f = 0.122 ± 0.095, P <0.001) than in fibrosis (D = 1.423 ± 0.364 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; f = 0.190 ± 0.120); while D was significantly higher in NPC (111.366 ± 65.528 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P <0.001) than in fibrosis (77.468 ± 62.168 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Respective cut-off values with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were: D = 1.062 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (100 %, 100 %, 100 %); f = 0.132 (66.0 %, 100 %, 78.3 %); D = 85.283 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (100 %, 90.7 %, 96.4 %). CONCLUSION: NPC and post-chemoradiation fibrosis have distinctive IVIM parameters. IVIM MR imaging is potentially useful in discrimination between NPC and fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • New MRI techniques offer greater help in the assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. • Tumour and post-chemoradiation fibrosis have distinctive intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion/perfusion parameters. • Non-invasive IVIM MRI may help differentiate between tumour and fibrosis. • Pure diffusion is a robust independent discriminating factor which improves diagnostic confidence.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion and perfusion characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and post-chemoradiation fibrosis to aid in their differentiation. METHODS: Fifty-three (64 %) patients with newly diagnosed NPC and 30 (36 %) patients with biopsy-proven post-chemoradiation fibrosis were recruited into tumour and fibrosis groups respectively. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed using 13 b values (0-1,000 s/mm(2)). Their respective IVIM parameters (D, pure diffusion; f, perfusion fraction; D, pseudodiffusion coefficient) were obtained. RESULTS: D and f were significantly lower in NPC (D = 0.752 ± 0.194 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P <0.001; f = 0.122 ± 0.095, P <0.001) than in fibrosis (D = 1.423 ± 0.364 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; f = 0.190 ± 0.120); while D was significantly higher in NPC (111.366 ± 65.528 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P <0.001) than in fibrosis (77.468 ± 62.168 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Respective cut-off values with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were: D = 1.062 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (100 %, 100 %, 100 %); f = 0.132 (66.0 %, 100 %, 78.3 %); D = 85.283 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (100 %, 90.7 %, 96.4 %). CONCLUSION: NPC and post-chemoradiation fibrosis have distinctive IVIM parameters. IVIM MR imaging is potentially useful in discrimination between NPC and fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • New MRI techniques offer greater help in the assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. • Tumour and post-chemoradiation fibrosis have distinctive intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion/perfusion parameters. • Non-invasive IVIM MRI may help differentiate between tumour and fibrosis. • Pure diffusion is a robust independent discriminating factor which improves diagnostic confidence.
Authors: Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J Wang; S Takashima; F Takayama; S Kawakami; A Saito; T Matsushita; M Momose; T Ishiyama Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yuxi Pang; Baris Turkbey; Marcelino Bernardo; Jochen Kruecker; Samuel Kadoury; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Vincent Lai; Xiao Li; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Bingsheng Huang; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Vincent Lai; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Henry Chun Kin Sze; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yao Ding; John D Hazle; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Steven J Frank; Brian P Hobbs; Rivka R Colen; G Brandon Gunn; Jihong Wang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Adam S Garden; Stephen Y Lai; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.044