OBJECTIVES: To test whether parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can be used to distinguish lung cancer from obstructive pulmonary consolidation by comparing them with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-derived parameters and to evaluate the correlation between these quantitative parameters. METHODS: A total of 31 lung cancer patients, confirmed by pathology and obstructive consolidations confirmed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT), were recruited. All of them were assessed with structural MRI and IVIM and 17 of them underwent additional DCE-MRI examinations. Parameters derived from IVIM and DCE-MRI in the tumour and consolidation were analysed, and the optimal cut-off values in differential diagnosis were obtained. RESULTS: ADC(total), D and f values were lower (P < 0.05), while IAUC60 was higher in lung cancers (P = 0.013) compared with obstructive pulmonary consolidations. According to the ROC curve, ADC(total) outperformed other perfusion and diffusion parameters with the optimal cut-off value of 1.409 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (AUC = 0.95). Poor correlations were found between parameters derived from IVIM and DCE-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: IVIM-MRI is potentially useful in the differentiation of lung cancer and obstructive pulmonary consolidation. ADC(total), D and f may be reliable independent discriminating markers, but D* is variable with low diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Lung cancer and consolidation differentiation is essential for treatment decision-making. • Perfusion and diffusion characteristics of lesions could help differential diagnosis. • IVIM can separate reflection of tissue diffusivity and microcapillary perfusion. • The relationship between perfusion quantified by IVIM and DCE-MRI is controversial.
OBJECTIVES: To test whether parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can be used to distinguish lung cancer from obstructive pulmonary consolidation by comparing them with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-derived parameters and to evaluate the correlation between these quantitative parameters. METHODS: A total of 31 lung cancerpatients, confirmed by pathology and obstructive consolidations confirmed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT), were recruited. All of them were assessed with structural MRI and IVIM and 17 of them underwent additional DCE-MRI examinations. Parameters derived from IVIM and DCE-MRI in the tumour and consolidation were analysed, and the optimal cut-off values in differential diagnosis were obtained. RESULTS: ADC(total), D and f values were lower (P < 0.05), while IAUC60 was higher in lung cancers (P = 0.013) compared with obstructive pulmonary consolidations. According to the ROC curve, ADC(total) outperformed other perfusion and diffusion parameters with the optimal cut-off value of 1.409 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (AUC = 0.95). Poor correlations were found between parameters derived from IVIM and DCE-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: IVIM-MRI is potentially useful in the differentiation of lung cancer and obstructive pulmonary consolidation. ADC(total), D and f may be reliable independent discriminating markers, but D* is variable with low diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Lung cancer and consolidation differentiation is essential for treatment decision-making. • Perfusion and diffusion characteristics of lesions could help differential diagnosis. • IVIM can separate reflection of tissue diffusivity and microcapillary perfusion. • The relationship between perfusion quantified by IVIM and DCE-MRI is controversial.
Authors: Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hadrien A Dyvorne; Nicola Galea; Thomas Nevers; M Isabel Fiel; David Carpenter; Edmund Wong; Matthew Orton; Andre de Oliveira; Thorsten Feiweier; Marie-Louise Vachon; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sandra Pauls; Felix M Mottaghy; Stefan A Schmidt; Stefan Krüger; Peter Möller; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Arthur Wunderlich Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Z Xiao; Z Tang; J Qiang; S Wang; W Qian; Y Zhong; R Wang; J Wang; L Wu; W Tang; Z Zhang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.825