Literature DB >> 23719963

Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Jacob T Munro1, Donald S Garbuz, Bassam A Masri, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have several implant choices when managing Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures about the hip. Few long-term studies have reported outcomes for tapered fluted titanium stems. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) survival, with femoral revision as the end point, of distal taper stems in the treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures at our institution, (2) radiographic outcomes, and (3) quality of life and hip function after revision.
METHODS: Of the 200 patients with Vancouver B2 or B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision between February 2000 and February 2010, 55 (38 B2, 17 B3) were treated with modular tapered titanium stems. Of the surviving 47 patients, one was lost to followup, leaving 46 (30 B2, 16 B3) available for review at a mean of 54 months (range, 24-143 months). Initial indications for using these implants were treatment of periprosthetic fractures where less than 4 cm of diaphyseal fit was available, but this evolved during the study period to all fractures unless no diaphysis remained, in which case complex revision techniques were used. Radiographs were assessed to establish fracture healing, stem subsidence, and bone stock restoration. Quality of life and hip function were assessed using WOMAC, Oxford, SF-12, UCLA activity level, and satisfaction scores.
RESULTS: Two femoral stems were revised: one subsided and was revised at 12 months; the other had deep infection and underwent two-stage revision at 49 months. Radiographic review showed one nonunion, with maintenance or improvement of bone stock in 89% of patients. Subsidence occurred in 24%. Mean Oxford score was 76 of 100, WOMAC function and pain scores were 75 and 82 of 100, satisfaction score was 91 of 100, and SF-12 mental and physical scores were 53 and 40 of 100.
CONCLUSIONS: We report encouraging short-term results in terms of survival of distal taper stems in the treatment of B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures. Although subsidence was frequent, most migrated less than 3 mm without correlation to poor pain and functional scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23719963      PMCID: PMC3890200          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis.

Authors:  R Biedermann; M Krismer; B Stöckl; P Mayrhofer; E Ornstein; H Franzén
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

2.  Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint].

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem.

Authors:  Sanjay Mulay; Tarig Hassan; Stuart Birtwistle; Richard Power
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

6.  The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A postmortem analysis.

Authors:  C A Engh; J P McAuley; C J Sychterz; M E Sacco; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions.

Authors:  Ole Ovesen; Claus Emmeluth; Christian Hofbauer; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Louis M Kwong; A John Miller; Phillipp Lubinus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients.

Authors:  H Malchau; J Kärrholm; Y X Wang; P Herberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-10
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Janna van den Kieboom; Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala; Liang Xiong; Christian Klemt; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Stefano Congia; Roberto Civinini; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

5.  Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center.

Authors:  Rajesh Pawar; Rye Yap; Jody Blow; Mohanrao Garabadi; Mark Rowsell; Hasnat Minhas; Prasad Antapur
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.

Authors:  Donghai Li; Qinsheng Hu; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Management of Vancouver Type-B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Restoring Femoral Length via Preoperative Planning and Surgical Execution Using a Cementless, Tapered, Fluted Stem.

Authors:  José A Rodriguez; Zachary P Berliner; Carlos A Williams; Jonathan Robinson; Matthew S Hepinstall; H John Cooper
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-09-13

8.  Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Authors:  Gihan Jayasinghe; Chris Buckle; Lucy Clare Maling; Christopher To; Chukwudubem Anibueze; Parthiban Vinayakam; Richard Slack
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-05

9.  The Outcomes of Cemented Femoral Revisions for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: Comparison with Cementless Stems.

Authors:  Pavel Sponer; Martin Korbel; Michal Grinac; Libor Prokes; Ales Bezrouk; Tomas Kucera
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.