Literature DB >> 23708802

The role of the cross-sensory error signal in visuomotor adaptation.

Danielle Salomonczyk1, Erin K Cressman, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

Reaching to targets with misaligned visual feedback of the hand leads to changes in proprioceptive estimates of hand position and reach aftereffects. In such tasks, subjects are able to make use of two error signals: the discrepancy between the desired and actual movement, known as the sensorimotor error signal, and the discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive estimates of hand position, which we refer to as the cross-sensory error signal. We have recently shown that mere exposure to a sensory discrepancy in the absence of goal-directed movement (i.e. no sensorimotor error signal) is sufficient to produce similar changes in felt hand position and reach aftereffects. Here, we sought to determine the extent that this cross-sensory error signal can contribute to proprioceptive recalibration and movement aftereffects by manipulating the magnitude of this signal in the absence of volitional aiming movements. Subjects pushed their hand out along a robot-generated linear path that was gradually rotated clockwise relative to the path of a cursor. On all trials, subjects viewed a cursor that headed directly towards a remembered target while their hand moved out synchronously. After exposure to a 30° rotated hand-cursor distortion, subjects recalibrated their sense of felt hand position and adapted their reaches. However, no additional increases in recalibration or aftereffects were observed following further increases in the cross-sensory error signal (e.g. up to 70°). This is in contrast to our previous study where subjects freely reached to targets with misaligned visual hand position feedback, hence experiencing both sensorimotor and cross-sensory errors, and the distortion magnitude systematically predicted increases in proprioceptive recalibration and reach aftereffects. Given these findings, we suggest that the cross-sensory error signal results in changes to felt hand position which drive partial reach aftereffects, while larger aftereffects that are produced after visuomotor adaptation (and that vary with the size of distortion) are related to the sensorimotor error signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708802     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3564-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

4.  Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures.

Authors:  B Treutwein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner; Peter Thier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  21 in total

1.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nilufer Nourouzpour; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Proprioceptive recalibration following implicit visuomotor adaptation is preserved in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Alina Constantin; Janis Miyasaki; Elena Moro; Robert Chen; Antonio Strafella; Susan Fox; Anthony E Lang; Howard Poizner; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Alissa R Stover; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Time Course of Reach Adaptation and Proprioceptive Recalibration during Visuomotor Learning.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ruttle; Erin K Cressman; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements.

Authors:  Anil Ufuk Batmaz; Michel de Mathelin; Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-11-14

9.  Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Victoria Barkley; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Separating Predicted and Perceived Sensory Consequences of Motor Learning.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.