Literature DB >> 23237466

Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.

Denise Y P Henriques1, Erin K Cressman.   

Abstract

Motor learning, in particular motor adaptation, is driven by information from multiple senses. For example, when arm control is faulty, vision, touch, and proprioception can all report on the arm's movements and help guide the adjustments necessary for correcting motor error. In recent years we have learned a lot about how the brain integrates information from multiple senses for the purpose of perception. However, less is known about how multisensory data guide motor learning. Most models of, and studies on, motor learning focus almost exclusively on the ensuing changes in motor performance without exploring the implications on sensory plasticity. Nor do they consider how discrepancies in sensory information (e.g., vision and proprioception) related to hand position may affect motor learning. Here, we discuss research from our lab and others that shows how motor learning paradigms affect proprioceptive estimates of hand position, and how even the mere discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedback can affect learning and plasticity. Our results suggest that sensorimotor learning mechanisms do not exclusively rely on motor plasticity and motor memory, and that sensory plasticity, in particular proprioceptive recalibration, plays a unique and important role in motor learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237466     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.659232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  39 in total

1.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Jordan A Taylor; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Rozbeh Kamran-Disfani; Golsa Bahari-Kashani; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Movement and perception recalibrate differently across multiple days of locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Kevin A Day; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Continuous reports of sensed hand position during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Influence of movement kinematics on visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Anja Simon; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The role of the cross-sensory error signal in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.