Marilyn Heng1, James G Wright. 1. The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scheduling emergency cases among elective surgeries often results in prolonged waits for emergency surgery and delays or cancellation of elective cases. We evaluated the benefits of a dedicated operating room (OR) for emergency procedures available to all surgical services at a large children's hospital. METHODS: We compared a 6-month period (January 2009 to June 2009) preimplementation with a 6-month period (January 2010 to June 2010) postimplementation of a dedicated OR. We evaluated OR use, wait times, percentage of cases done within and outside of access targets, off-hours surgery, cancellations, overruns and length of stay. RESULTS: Preimplementation, 1069 of the 5500 surgeries performed were emergency cases. Postimplementation, 1084 of the 5358 surgeries performed were emergency cases. Overall use of the dedicated OR was 53% (standard deviation 25%) postimplementation. Excluding outliers, the average wait time for priority 3 emergency patients decreased from 11 hours 8 minutes to 10 hours 5 minutes (p = 0.004). An increased proportion of priority 3 patients, from 52% to 58%, received surgery within 12 hours (p = 0.020). There was a 9% decrease in the proportion of priority 3 cases completed during the evening and night (p < 0.001). The elective surgical schedule benefited from the dedicated OR, with a significant decrease in cancellations (1.5% v. 0.7%, p < 0.001) and an accumulated decrease of 5211 minutes in overrun minutes in elective rooms. The average hospital stay after emergency surgery decreased from 16.0 days to 14.7 days (p = 0.12) following implementation of the dedicated OR. CONCLUSION: A dedicated OR for emergency cases improved quality of care by decreasing cancellations and overruns in elective rooms and increasing the proportion of priority 3 patients who accessed care within the targeted time.
BACKGROUND: Scheduling emergency cases among elective surgeries often results in prolonged waits for emergency surgery and delays or cancellation of elective cases. We evaluated the benefits of a dedicated operating room (OR) for emergency procedures available to all surgical services at a large children's hospital. METHODS: We compared a 6-month period (January 2009 to June 2009) preimplementation with a 6-month period (January 2010 to June 2010) postimplementation of a dedicated OR. We evaluated OR use, wait times, percentage of cases done within and outside of access targets, off-hours surgery, cancellations, overruns and length of stay. RESULTS: Preimplementation, 1069 of the 5500 surgeries performed were emergency cases. Postimplementation, 1084 of the 5358 surgeries performed were emergency cases. Overall use of the dedicated OR was 53% (standard deviation 25%) postimplementation. Excluding outliers, the average wait time for priority 3 emergency patients decreased from 11 hours 8 minutes to 10 hours 5 minutes (p = 0.004). An increased proportion of priority 3 patients, from 52% to 58%, received surgery within 12 hours (p = 0.020). There was a 9% decrease in the proportion of priority 3 cases completed during the evening and night (p < 0.001). The elective surgical schedule benefited from the dedicated OR, with a significant decrease in cancellations (1.5% v. 0.7%, p < 0.001) and an accumulated decrease of 5211 minutes in overrun minutes in elective rooms. The average hospital stay after emergency surgery decreased from 16.0 days to 14.7 days (p = 0.12) following implementation of the dedicated OR. CONCLUSION: A dedicated OR for emergency cases improved quality of care by decreasing cancellations and overruns in elective rooms and increasing the proportion of priority 3 patients who accessed care within the targeted time.
Authors: Timothy Bhattacharyya; Mark S Vrahas; Suzanne M Morrison; Edward Kim; Richard A Wiklund; R Malcolm Smith; Harry E Rubash Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-06
Authors: John P Pryor; Patrick M Reilly; C William Schwab; Donald R Kauder; G Paul Dabrowski; Vicente H Gracias; Benjamin Braslow; Rajan Gupta Journal: J Trauma Date: 2004-09
Authors: John J Wixted; Mark Reed; Mark S Eskander; Bryce Millar; Richard C Anderson; Kaushik Bagchi; Shubjeet Kaur; Patricia Franklin; Walter Leclair Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Gerhard Wullink; Mark Van Houdenhoven; Erwin W Hans; Jeroen M van Oostrum; Marieke van der Lans; Geert Kazemier Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: William M Ricci; Bethany Gallagher; Angel Brandt; John Schwappach; Michael Tucker; Ross Leighton Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Daniel I McIsaac; Karim Abdulla; Homer Yang; Sudhir Sundaresan; Paula Doering; Sandeep Green Vaswani; Kednapa Thavorn; Alan J Forster Journal: CMAJ Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Marie Persson; Helena Hvitfeldt-Forsberg; Maria Unbeck; Olof Gustaf Sköldenberg; Andreas Stark; Paula Kelly-Pettersson; Pamela Mazzocato Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Baiduree Borhan; Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan; Mohamad Hasyizan Hassan; Laila Ab Mukmin; Abd Rahman Izaini Ghani Journal: Malays J Med Sci Date: 2021-04-24