BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of perfusion parameters is important in the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from revascularization after an acute ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring cerebral perfusion parameters with the use of a novel high-speed C-arm CT acquisition in conjunction with a single intravenous injection of contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven canines had experimentally induced focal ischemic regions confirmed by CT perfusion imaging. Four hours after ischemic injury creation, each subject underwent cerebral perfusion measurements with the use of standard perfusion CT, immediately followed by the use of C-arm CT. Cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume maps measured by C-arm CT were quantitatively and qualitatively compared with those measured by perfusion CT for 6 of the 7 canine subjects. RESULTS: Results from independent observer evaluations of perfusion CT and C-arm perfusion maps show strong agreement between observers for identification of ischemic lesion location. Significant percentage agreement between observers for lesion detection and identification of perfusion mismatch between CBV and CBF maps indicate that the maps for both perfusion CT and C-arm are easy to interpret. Quantitative region of interest-based evaluation showed a strong correlation between the perfusion CT and C-arm CBV and CBF maps (R(2) = 0.68 and 0.85). C-arm measurements for both CBV and CBF were consistently overestimated when compared with perfusion CT. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and quantitative measurements of CBF and CBV with the use of a C-arm CT acquisition and a single intravenous injection of contrast agent are feasible. Future improvements in flat detector technology and software algorithms probably will enable more accurate quantitative perfusion measurements with the use of C-arm CT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of perfusion parameters is important in the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from revascularization after an acute ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring cerebral perfusion parameters with the use of a novel high-speed C-arm CT acquisition in conjunction with a single intravenous injection of contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven canines had experimentally induced focal ischemic regions confirmed by CT perfusion imaging. Four hours after ischemic injury creation, each subject underwent cerebral perfusion measurements with the use of standard perfusion CT, immediately followed by the use of C-arm CT. Cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume maps measured by C-arm CT were quantitatively and qualitatively compared with those measured by perfusion CT for 6 of the 7 canine subjects. RESULTS: Results from independent observer evaluations of perfusion CT and C-arm perfusion maps show strong agreement between observers for identification of ischemic lesion location. Significant percentage agreement between observers for lesion detection and identification of perfusion mismatch between CBV and CBF maps indicate that the maps for both perfusion CT and C-arm are easy to interpret. Quantitative region of interest-based evaluation showed a strong correlation between the perfusion CT and C-arm CBV and CBF maps (R(2) = 0.68 and 0.85). C-arm measurements for both CBV and CBF were consistently overestimated when compared with perfusion CT. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and quantitative measurements of CBF and CBV with the use of a C-arm CT acquisition and a single intravenous injection of contrast agent are feasible. Future improvements in flat detector technology and software algorithms probably will enable more accurate quantitative perfusion measurements with the use of C-arm CT.
Authors: A S Ahmed; M Zellerhoff; C M Strother; K A Pulfer; T Redel; Y Deuerling-Zheng; K Royalty; D Consigny; D B Niemann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreas Fieselmann; Arundhuti Ganguly; Yu Deuerling-Zheng; Michael Zellerhoff; Christopher Rohkohl; Jan Boese; Joachim Hornegger; Rebecca Fahrig Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Mark Supanich; Yinghua Tao; Brian Nett; Kari Pulfer; Jiang Hsieh; Patrick Turski; Charles Mistretta; Howard Rowley; Guang-Hong Chen Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Armando Manduca; Lifeng Yu; Joshua D Trzasko; Natalia Khaylova; James M Kofler; Cynthia M McCollough; Joel G Fletcher Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: T Struffert; Y Deuerling-Zheng; S Kloska; T Engelhorn; C M Strother; W A Kalender; M Köhrmann; S Schwab; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Max Wintermark; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko; Marcel Quist; Pierre Schnyder; William P Dillon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K M Thierfelder; W H Sommer; B Ertl-Wagner; S E Beyer; F G Meinel; W G Kunz; G Buchholz; M F Reiser; H Janssen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Struffert; Y Deuerling-Zheng; S Kloska; T Engelhorn; S Lang; A Mennecke; M Manhart; C M Strother; S Schwab; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K Niu; P Yang; Y Wu; T Struffert; A Doerfler; S Schafer; K Royalty; C Strother; G-H Chen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sebastian E Beyer; Louisa von Baumgarten; Kolja M Thierfelder; Marietta Rottenkolber; Hendrik Janssen; Martin Dichgans; Thorsten Rc Johnson; Andreas Straube; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Maximilian F Reiser; Wieland H Sommer Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: O Beuing; A Boese; Y Kyriakou; Y Deuerling-Zengh; B Jöllenbeck; C Scherlach; A Lenz; S Serowy; S Gugel; G Rose; M Skalej Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 3.825