Literature DB >> 23687961

A 3D printed fluidic device that enables integrated features.

Kari B Anderson1, Sarah Y Lockwood, R Scott Martin, Dana M Spence.   

Abstract

Fluidic devices fabricated using conventional soft lithography are well suited as prototyping methods. Three-dimensional (3D) printing, commonly used for producing design prototypes in industry, allows for one step production of devices. 3D printers build a device layer by layer based on 3D computer models. Here, a reusable, high throughput, 3D printed fluidic device was created that enables flow and incorporates a membrane above a channel in order to study drug transport and affect cells. The device contains 8 parallel channels, 3 mm wide by 1.5 mm deep, connected to a syringe pump through standard, threaded fittings. The device was also printed to allow integration with commercially available membrane inserts whose bottoms are constructed of a porous polycarbonate membrane; this insert enables molecular transport to occur from the channel to above the well. When concentrations of various antibiotics (levofloxacin and linezolid) are pumped through the channels, approximately 18-21% of the drug migrates through the porous membrane, providing evidence that this device will be useful for studies where drug effects on cells are investigated. Finally, we show that mammalian cells cultured on this membrane can be affected by reagents flowing through the channels. Specifically, saponin was used to compromise cell membranes, and a fluorescent label was used to monitor the extent, resulting in a 4-fold increase in fluorescence for saponin treated cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23687961     DOI: 10.1021/ac4009594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  50 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  3D-Printed Fluidic Devices for Nanoparticle Preparation and Flow-Injection Amperometry Using Integrated Prussian Blue Nanoparticle-Modified Electrodes.

Authors:  Gregory W Bishop; Jennifer E Satterwhite; Snehasis Bhakta; Karteek Kadimisetty; Kelsey M Gillette; Eric Chen; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated versatile and reusable electrodes.

Authors:  Jayda L Erkal; Asmira Selimovic; Bethany C Gross; Sarah Y Lockwood; Eric L Walton; Stephen McNamara; R Scott Martin; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Bryce P Bickham; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

6.  Fully 3D printed integrated reactor array for point-of-care molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Jinzhao Song; Aoife M Doto; Young Hwang; Jing Peng; Michael G Mauk; Frederic D Bushman; Robert Gross; Joseph N Jarvis; Changchun Liu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Anna V Nielsen; Hua Gong; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Direct embedding and versatile placement of electrodes in 3D printed microfluidic-devices.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Emily R Currens; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.616

9.  Biocompatible PEGDA Resin for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Chandler Warr; Jonard Corpuz Valdoz; Bryce P Bickham; Connor J Knight; Nicholas A Franks; Nicholas Chartrand; Pam M Van Ry; Kenneth A Christensen; Gregory P Nordin; Alonzo D Cook
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-02-27

10.  Drug penetration and metabolism in 3D cell cultures treated in a 3D printed fluidic device: assessment of irinotecan via MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Gabriel J LaBonia; Sarah Y Lockwood; Andrew A Heller; Dana M Spence; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.