Literature DB >> 25901660

3D-Printed Fluidic Devices for Nanoparticle Preparation and Flow-Injection Amperometry Using Integrated Prussian Blue Nanoparticle-Modified Electrodes.

Gregory W Bishop1, Jennifer E Satterwhite1, Snehasis Bhakta1, Karteek Kadimisetty1, Kelsey M Gillette1, Eric Chen1, James F Rusling1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

A consumer-grade fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer was used to construct fluidic devices for nanoparticle preparation and electrochemical sensing. Devices were printed using poly(ethylene terephthalate) and featured threaded ports to connect polyetheretherketone (PEEK) tubing via printed fittings prepared from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). These devices included channels designed to have 800 μm × 800 μm square cross sections and were semitransparent to allow visualization of the solution-filled channels. A 3D-printed device with a Y-shaped mixing channel was used to prepare Prussian blue nanoparticles (PBNPs) under flow rates of 100 to 2000 μL min(-1). PBNPs were then attached to gold electrodes for hydrogen peroxide sensing. 3D-printed devices used for electrochemical measurements featured threaded access ports into which a fitting equipped with reference, counter, and PBNP-modified working electrodes could be inserted. PBNP-modified electrodes enabled amperometric detection of H2O2 in the 3D-printed channel by flow-injection analysis, exhibiting a detection limit of 100 nM and linear response up to 20 μM. These experiments show that a consumer-grade FFF printer can be used to fabricate low-cost fluidic devices for applications similar to those that have been reported with more expensive 3D-printing methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25901660      PMCID: PMC4439300          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  29 in total

1.  Prototyping of microfluidic devices in poly(dimethylsiloxane) using solid-object printing.

Authors:  J Cooper McDonald; Michael L Chabinyc; Steven J Metallo; Janelle R Anderson; Abraham D Stroock; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Ultrasensitive immunosensor for cancer biomarker proteins using gold nanoparticle film electrodes and multienzyme-particle amplification.

Authors:  Vigneshwaran Mani; Bhaskara V Chikkaveeraiah; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices.

Authors:  Philip J Kitson; Mali H Rosnes; Victor Sans; Vincenza Dragone; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites.

Authors:  Brett G Compton; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Three-dimensional printed sample load/inject valves enabling online monitoring of extracellular calcium and zinc ions in living rat brains.

Authors:  Cheng-Kuan Su; Sheng-Chieh Hsia; Yuh-Chang Sun
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  An ultrasensitive hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on electrocatalytic synergy of graphene-gold nanocomposite, CdTe-CdS core-shell quantum dots and gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Zhiguo Gu; Shuping Yang; Zaijun Li; Xiulan Sun; Guangli Wang; Yinjun Fang; Junkang Liu
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.558

8.  A simple and an efficient strategy to synthesize multi-component nanocomposites for biosensor applications.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Lu; Yan Li; Xia Zhang; Jie Du; Xibin Zhou; Zhonghua Xue; Xiuhui Liu
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  A personalized food allergen testing platform on a cellphone.

Authors:  Ahmet F Coskun; Justin Wong; Delaram Khodadadi; Richie Nagi; Andrew Tey; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  3D-Printing of Functional Biomedical Microdevices via Light- and Extrusion-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Henry H Hwang; Wei Zhu; Grace Victorine; Natalie Lawrence; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Automated 3-D Printed Arrays to Evaluate Genotoxic Chemistry: E-Cigarettes and Water Samples.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

5.  Fully 3D printed integrated reactor array for point-of-care molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Jinzhao Song; Aoife M Doto; Young Hwang; Jing Peng; Michael G Mauk; Frederic D Bushman; Robert Gross; Joseph N Jarvis; Changchun Liu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  FDM 3D Printing of High-Pressure, Heat-Resistant, Transparent Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Valentin Romanov; Raheel Samuel; Marzieh Chaharlang; Alexander R Jafek; Adam Frost; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Electrochemiluminescence at Bare and DNA-Coated Graphite Electrodes in 3D-Printed Fluidic Devices.

Authors:  Gregory W Bishop; Jennifer E Satterwhite-Warden; Itti Bist; Eric Chen; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.711

8.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  3D-printed supercapacitor-powered electrochemiluminescent protein immunoarray.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Islam M Mosa; Spundana Malla; Jennifer E Satterwhite-Warden; Tyler M Kuhns; Ronaldo C Faria; Norman H Lee; James F Rusling
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  Automated 3D-Printed Microfluidic Array for Rapid Nanomaterial-Enhanced Detection of Multiple Proteins.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; Ketki S Bhalerao; Islam M Mosa; Snehasis Bhakta; Norman H Lee; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.