Literature DB >> 34342694

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects.

Yueqiang Zhu1, Avice M O'Connell2, Yue Ma1, Aidi Liu1, Haijie Li1, Yuwei Zhang1, Xiaohua Zhang3, Zhaoxiang Ye4.   

Abstract

Dedicated breast CT is an emerging 3D isotropic imaging technology for breast, which overcomes the limitations of 2D compression mammography and limited angle tomosynthesis while providing some of the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging. This first installment in a 2-part review describes the evolution of dedicated breast CT beginning with a historical perspective and progressing to the present day. Moreover, it provides an overview of state-of-the-art technology. Particular emphasis is placed on technical limitations in scan protocol, radiation dose, breast coverage, patient comfort, and image artifact. Proposed methods of how to address these technical challenges are also discussed. KEY POINTS: • Advantages of breast CT include no tissue overlap, improved patient comfort, rapid acquisition, and concurrent assessment of microcalcifications and contrast enhancement. • Current clinical and prototype dedicated breast CT systems differ in acquisition modes, imaging techniques, and detector types. • There are still details to be decided regarding breast CT techniques, such as scan protocol, radiation dose, breast coverage, patient comfort, and image artifact.
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Breast; Cone-beam computed tomography; History; Radiation dosage

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342694     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08179-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  70 in total

1.  Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Ruola Ning
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Daniel T Kawakyu-O'Connor
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Joseph Y Lo; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Editorial comment: cone-beam and phase contrast CT: new horizons in breast imaging?

Authors:  Andreas Boss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Computed tomography of the breast. A preliminary report.

Authors:  C H Chang; J L Sibala; J H Gallagher; R C Riley; A W Templeton; P V Beasley; R A Porte
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Clinical evaluation of computerized tomographic mammography.

Authors:  J J Gisvold; P R Karsell; E C Reese
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Carl J D'Orsi; David J Getty; Ronald M Pickett; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Mary S Newell; Kathleen R Gundry; Sandra R Bates; Robert M Nishikawa; Edward A Sickles; Andrew Karellas; Ellen M D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.

Authors:  Archie Bleyer; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mostafa Alabousi; Nanxi Zha; Jean-Paul Salameh; Lucy Samoilov; Anahita Dehmoobad Sharifabadi; Alex Pozdnyakov; Behnam Sadeghirad; Vivianne Freitas; Matthew D F McInnes; Abdullah Alabousi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Screening: Opportunities and Challenges with Fully 3D Tomographic X-Ray Imaging.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Bridge (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-03-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.