Literature DB >> 24906294

Magnetic resonance imaging of painful metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Vassilios S Nikolaou1, Alain Petit, Viviane Khoury, Etienne Blain-Pare, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou.   

Abstract

Consecutive patients that had primary metal-on-metal (MoM) or metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled to this study. All operated hips were evaluated with MRI by one radiologist who was blinded to the radiographic findings and clinical symptoms. Three groups of patients were formed: (1) thirteen MoM THRs in 13 patients with groin pain (Group 1), (2) ten MoM THRs in 10 patients with no pain (Group 2), (3) five MoP THRs in 4 patients without pain (control group). Abnormal MRI findings were distributed in all groups in a balanced way, irrespective of the patients' symptoms, prostheses, or metal ion levels. Two patients from Group 1 and one patient of Group 3 (control group) were diagnosed with a large periprosthetic mass (pseudotumor).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24906294     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1491-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  31 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Simon J Ostlere; Peter McLardy-Smith; Nicholas A Athanasou; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Can a safe level for metal ions in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties be determined?

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  J S Suh; E K Jeong; K H Shin; J H Cho; J B Na; D H Kim; C D Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Formation of a fulminant soft-tissue pseudotumor after uncemented hip arthroplasty. A case report.

Authors:  O Svensson; E B Mathiesen; F P Reinholt; G Blomgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  MRI of asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal and polyethylene-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  A Mistry; J Cahir; S T Donell; J Nolan; A P Toms
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

9.  The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A J Hart; S Sabah; J Henckel; A Lewis; J Cobb; B Sampson; A Mitchell; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-06

Review 10.  Metal sensitivities and orthopaedic implants revisited: the potential for metal allergy with the new metal-on-metal joint prostheses.

Authors:  D J Gawkrodger
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.302

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pseudotumor in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a comparison study of three grading systems with MRI.

Authors:  C Smeekes; B J M Schouten; M Nix; B F Ongkiehong; R Wolterbeek; B C H van der Wal; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.