Literature DB >> 23672973

A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.

Jinhai Huang1, Xixia Ding, Giacomo Savini, Chao Pan, Yifan Feng, Dan Cheng, Yanjun Hua, Xiuli Hu, Qinmei Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of 3 rotating Scheimpflug cameras, the Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Sirius (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy), and Galilei (Ziemer, Biel, Switzerland), and 1 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) system, the RTvue-100 OCT (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA), in measuring corneal thickness.
DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six right eyes of 66 healthy volunteers, whose mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 35.39±10.06 years (range, 18-55 years).
METHODS: Corneal thickness measurements obtained by each system included central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and midperipheral corneal thickness (MPCT), measured at superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal locations at a distance of 1 and 2.5 mm from the corneal apex. In the first session, 3 consecutive measurements were performed by the same operator to assess intraobserver repeatability and by a second operator to assess interobserver reproducibility. Measurements were repeated in the second session scheduled 1 day to 1 week later. The mean values obtained in the 2 sessions by the first operator were used to investigate the intersession reproducibility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver and intersession repeatability of corneal thickness measurements, as calculated by means of within-subject SD, test-retest repeatability, coefficient of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: The precision of CCT, TCT, CT2 mm (midperipheral corneal thickness [MPCT] with a distance of 1 mm from the corneal apex), and CT5 mm (midperipheral corneal thickness [MPCT] with a distance of 2.5 mm from the corneal apex) measurements was high with all 4 systems. The COV was ≤1.16%, 0.94%, and 1.10% for repeatability, interobserver reproducibility, and intersession reproducibility, respectively. The 4 devices offered better interobserver reproducibility than intersession reproducibility for all measurements. The CTsuperior-5 mm (midperipheral corneal thickness [MPCT], measured at superior locations with a distance of 2.5 mm from the corneal apex) measurements showed the poorest repeatability and reproducibility. The Galilei revealed the best precision of CCT, TCT, and CT2 mm measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Both Scheimpflug imaging and FD-OCT offer highly repeatable and reproducible measurements of CCT and MPCT. The precision was lower in the midperipheral superior quadrant. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23672973     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  34 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  David Kuerten; Niklas Plange; Eva Charlotte Koch; Antonis Koutsonas; Peter Walter; Matthias Fuest
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.

Authors:  Irmak Karaca; Suzan Guven Yilmaz; Melis Palamar; Halil Ates
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Jihan Akhtar; Michael J Lynn; Renato Ambrósio; William J Dupps; Ronald R Krueger; Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Precision of corneal thickness measurements obtained using the scheimpflug-placido imaging and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Giacomo Savini; Chengfang Wang; Weicong Lu; Rongrong Gao; Yuanguang Li; Qinmei Wang; Yune Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry.

Authors:  Hyun Cheol Roh; Roy S Chuck; Jimmy K Lee; Choul Yong Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Ayong Yu; Weiqi Zhao; Giacomo Savini; Zixu Huang; Fangjun Bao; Weicong Lu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Central and midperipheral corneal thickness measured with Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Xixia Ding; Giacomo Savini; Zhengxuan Jiang; Chao Pan; Yanjun Hua; Fan Wu; Yifan Feng; Ye Yu; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clear-cornea cataract surgery: pupil size and shape changes, along with anterior chamber volume and depth changes. A Scheimpflug imaging study.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-24

10.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Cornea With Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Imaging Before and After Lasik.

Authors:  Tommy C Y Chan; Sayantan Biswas; Marco Yu; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.