Literature DB >> 23670546

The technological invention of disease.

B Hofmann1.   

Abstract

Technology has come to play a profound role in medicine since the middle of the 19th century, and many scholars have analysed the role of technology in medicine. Parallel to this development there has been a comprehensive debate on the concept of disease. This article combines these fields and investigates the influence of technology on the concept of disease. With reference to the literature it tries to elaborate an explicit account of the constitutive role of technology in relation to the concept of disease. It will be argued that technology constitutes the concept of disease in three profound ways. Firstly, technology provides the physiological, biochemical, and biomolecular entities that are applied in defining diseases. Secondly, it establishes the way we try to gain knowledge of disease and the way we recognise disease in practice. Technology constitutes the signs, markers and end points that define disease entities and it strongly influences the explanatory models of disease as well as medical taxonomy. Thirdly, technology establishes how we act towards disease: thorough diagnosis and treatment technology establishes the actions that constitute the concept of disease. Altogether, this constitutive technological influence on the concept of disease is considered as a technological invention of disease.

Year:  2001        PMID: 23670546     DOI: 10.1136/mh.27.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Humanit        ISSN: 1468-215X


  10 in total

1.  The myth of technology in health care.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Beware: the misuse of technology and the law of unintended consequences.

Authors:  John M Freeman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Medical humanities: stranger at the gate, or long-lost friend?

Authors:  H M Evans
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-07-06

4.  Technological paternalism: on how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Technological medicine and the autonomy of man.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

7.  The role for autopsy in the intensive care unit: technological considerations.

Authors:  Carlos E Pompilio
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Governance Quality, Public Health, Education, and Innovation: Study for Novel Implications.

Authors:  Ning Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 9.  Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a review of the moral challenges.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Postmodernism and the decline of the clinical autopsy.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; Vincenzo Arena; Marco Dell'Aquila; Giuseppe Vetrugno; Simone Grassi; Egidio Stigliano; Antonio Oliva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.