Literature DB >> 12971295

Technological paternalism: on how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory.

Bjørn Hofmann1.   

Abstract

The objective of this article is to investigate ethical aspects of technology through the moral term "paternalism". The field of investigation is medicine. The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, "paternalism" has gained moral relevance through modern medicine, where physicians have been accused of behaving paternalistic and threatening patients' autonomy. Secondly, medicine is a brilliant area to scrutinise the evaluative aspects of technology. It is argued that paternalism is a morally relevant term for the ethics of technology, but that its traditional conception is not adequate to address the challenges of modern technology. A modification towards a "technological paternalism" is necessary. That is, "technological paternalism" is a fruitful term in the ethics of technology. Moreover, it is suited to point out the deficiencies of the traditional concept of paternalism and to reform and vitalise the conception of paternalism in ethics in order to handle the challenges of technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12971295     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-003-0031-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  The myth of technology in health care.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Technology, medicine & health, Part 4. Technological cancer: its causes & treatment.

Authors:  S N Davidson
Journal:  Healthc Forum J       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse?

Authors:  E S Fisher; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The technological invention of disease.

Authors:  B Hofmann
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2001-06

6.  The sorcerer's broom. Medicine's rampant technology.

Authors:  E J Cassell
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.

Authors:  E Falkum; R Førde
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.634

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  'Cool! and creepy': engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank.

Authors:  Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Daniel B Thiel; Nicole Fisher; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-12

2.  Correcting the Brain? The Convergence of Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Psychiatry, and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Stephen Rainey; Yasemin J Erden
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.