Literature DB >> 26912187

Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.

Bjørn Hofmann1,2.   

Abstract

Medicalization is frequently defined as a process by which some non-medical aspects of human life become to be considered as medical problems. Overdiagnosis, on the other hand, is most often defined as diagnosing a biomedical condition that in the absence of testing would not cause symptoms or death in the person's lifetime. Medicalization and overdiagnosis are related concepts as both expand the extension of the concept of disease. They are both often used normatively to critique unwarranted or contested expansion of medicine and to address health services that are considered to be unnecessary, futile, or even harmful. However, there are important differences between the concepts, as not all cases of overdiagnosis are medicalizations and not all cases of medicalizations are overdiagnosis. The objective of this article is to clarify the differences between medicalization and overdiagnosis. It will demonstrate how the subject matter of medicalization traditionally has been non-medical (social or cultural everyday life) phenomena, while the subject matter of overdiagnosis has been biological or biomolecular conditions or processes acknowledged being potentially harmful. They also refer to different types of uncertainty: medicalization is concerned with indeterminacy, while overdiagnosis is concerned with lack of prognostic knowledge. Medicalization is dealing with sickness (sick role) while overdiagnosis with disease. Despite these differences, medicalization and overdiagnosis are becoming more alike. Medicalization is expanding, encompassing the more "technical" aspects of overdiagnosis, while overdiagnosis is becoming more ideologized. Moreover, with new trends in modern medicine, such as P4 (preventive, predictive, personal, and participatory) medicine, medicalization will become all-encompassing, while overdiagnosis more or less may dissolve. In the end they may converge in some total "iatrogenization." In doing so, the concepts may lose their precision and critical sting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Futile; Ideology; Medicalization; Overdiagnosis; Science; Unnecessary

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912187     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9693-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  51 in total

1.  Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Jenny Doust; David Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-28

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Patient empowerment and the dilemmas of late-modern medicalisation.

Authors:  Nancy Tomes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Beyond medicalisation.

Authors:  Nikolas Rose
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Medicalisation in the 21st century: introduction.

Authors:  Jonathan M Metzl; Rebecca M Herzig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Risk and disease.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.416

7.  Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Bjorn Hofmann
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  The idea of medicalization: an anthropological perspective.

Authors:  H Fabrega
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.416

9.  Why physicians favor use of percutaneous coronary intervention to medical therapy: a focus group study.

Authors:  Grace A Lin; R Adams Dudley; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Jamie L Carter; Russell J Coletti; Russell P Harris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07
View more
  20 in total

1.  Overdiagnosis: one concept, three perspectives, and a model.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Lynette Reid; Stacy Carter; Wendy Rogers
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The overdiagnosis of what? On the relationship between the concepts of overdiagnosis, disease, and diagnosis.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

3.  Defining disease in the context of overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Mary Jean Walker; Wendy Rogers
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-06

4.  Overdiagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  The Pitfalls of Overtreatment: Why More Care is not Necessarily Beneficial.

Authors:  Kanny Ooi
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2020-08-19

6.  Euthymic suffering and wisdom psychology.

Authors:  Michael Linden
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 7.  What is a mental disorder? An exemplar-focused approach.

Authors:  Dan J Stein; Andrea C Palk; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine.

Authors:  Wieteke van Dijk; Marjan J Faber; Marit A C Tanke; Patrick P T Jeurissen; Gert P Westert
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-11-01

9.  Overdiagnosis: An Important Issue That Demands Rigour and Precision Comment on "Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine".

Authors:  Stacy M Carter
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-10-01

10.  On the Social Construction of Overdiagnosis Comment on "Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine".

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.