Literature DB >> 11840953

The myth of technology in health care.

Bjørn Hofmann1.   

Abstract

Technology is believed to have liberated health care from dogmas, myths and speculations of earlier times. However, we are accused of using technology in an excessive, futile and even detrimental way, as if technology is compelling our actions. It appears to be like the monster threatening Dr. Frankenstein or like the sorcerer's broom in the hand of the apprentice. That is, the same technology that should liberate us from myths, appears to be mythical. The objective of this article is to investigate the background for the re-entrance of the myth: How we encounter it and how we can explain it. The main point is that a myth of technology is normative: it relates 'is' and 'ought' and directs our actions. This becomes particularly clear in health care. Hence, if there is a myth of technology, it is an ethical issue, and should be taken seriously.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840953     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0030-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal viability in the 1990s: held hostage by technology.

Authors:  J Muraskas; P A Marshall; P Tomich; T F Myers; J G Gianopoulos; D C Thomasma
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Technology, medicine & health, Part 4. Technological cancer: its causes & treatment.

Authors:  S N Davidson
Journal:  Healthc Forum J       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

3.  The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of "anticipated decision regret".

Authors:  T Tymstra
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Overdosing on medical technology.

Authors:  D Hellerstein
Journal:  Technol Rev       Date:  1983 Aug-Sep

5.  [The prestige of diseases and medical specialties].

Authors:  D Album
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1991-06-30

6.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse?

Authors:  E S Fisher; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  The technological invention of disease.

Authors:  B Hofmann
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2001-06

9.  The sorcerer's broom. Medicine's rampant technology.

Authors:  E J Cassell
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  Surgery as a placebo.

Authors:  A G Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-10-22       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Science and technology for the good of society?

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Simplified models of the relationship between health and disease.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

Review 3.  The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships.

Authors:  Michael Weiner; Paul Biondich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Technological paternalism: on how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The 'Magic Light': A Discussion on Laser Ethics.

Authors:  Andreas Stylianou; Michael A Talias
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.